PLR 200049018: Radio programming fees are not passive investment income

Number
200049018
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Passive Investment Income
Code sections
§ 1362, § 469
Ruling dated
September 1, 2000
Publicly released
December 8, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation with accumulated C corporation earnings and profits arranged for an unrelated programmer to run some day to day operations of its radio stations and pay monthly fees. The company retained ownership, its broadcasting licenses, supervision and control, employees, and substantial station expenses. The IRS ruled that the programming agreement income was not passive investment income under section 1362(d)(3), which can matter to an S corporation with accumulated earnings and profits. The IRS did not decide whether the payments were rents or royalties, whether the company otherwise qualified as an S corporation, or how the separate section 469 passive activity rules applied.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Are the programming agreement fees passive investment income under section 1362?
  • Outcome: No, on the represented facts.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1362(d)(3), 469; Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-2(c)(5)(ii).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200049018
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 12/8/2000
Index Number: 1362.02-03
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:3 PLR-109445-00
Date:
1 September 2000

Company:

Programmer:

M:

Stations:

State:

Region:
a: b: c: d:

Dear

This letter responds to a letter from Company dated April 28, 2000, and

2
PLR-109445-00

subsequent correspondence, requesting a ruling that the income received by Company from a programming agreement is not passive investment income within the meaning of
§ 1362(d)(3)(C)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code. Company represents the following facts.

Company was incorporated in State in a and elected under § 1362(a) to be an S corporation effective b. M is Company’s president and majority shareholder. It has C corporation earnings and profits.

Company, under licenses from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), owns and operates c radio stations (the Stations) in Region. It has entered into the Agreement with Programmer, an unrelated firm, by which Programmer will take over some of the day-to-day operations of the Stations, including the solicitation of advertising (Programming Agreement). Programmer has agreed to operate the Stations for a term of years, at the end of which time it may exercise an option to purchase the Stations along with the broadcasting licenses (Option Agreement). Programmer will pay Company a monthly fee and will reimburse Company for reasonable amounts spent by Company for station operation, engineering, maintenance, administration, and other general expenses. In exchange, Programmer will retain its profits from advertising and operating revenues. Programmer will pay a separate fee for the Option Agreement to purchase the Stations.

Company has agreed to broadcast programming designated and provided by Programmer, subject to Company’s supervision and control. Company will continue to have full authority, control, and power over station policy, programming, and operation. Company must employ a sufficient number of employees in each of its d markets as required by the FCC, including a general manager who will be responsible for daily operations and accountable to Company. Company will be directly responsible for the salaries, taxes, insurance, and related costs for these employees. Company will be responsible, also, for legal fees, FCC fees, and janitorial expenses, as well as for transmitter site and main studio rent or mortgage payments.

Company represents that it will continue to own all of the assets subject to the Agreements and will continue to be the licensee, with all the obligations to the FCC that it had before entering into the Agreements with Programmer.

Except as provided in § 1362(g), § 1362(a)(1) provides that a small business corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of § 1362, to be an S corporation.

Section 1362(d)(3)(A)(i) provides that an election under § 1362(a) terminates whenever the corporation (I) has accumulated earnings and profits at the close of each of three consecutive tax years, and (II) has gross receipts for each of such tax years more than 25 percent of which are passive investment income.

3
PLR-109445-00

Except as otherwise provided in § 1362(d)(3)(C), § 1362(d)(3)(C)(i) provides that the term "passive investment income" means gross receipts derived from royalties, rents, dividends, interest, annuities, and sales or exchanges of stock or securities.

Section 1.1362-2(c)(5)(ii)(A)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that “royalties” means all royalties, including mineral, oil, and gas royalties, and amounts received for the privilege of using patents, copyrights, secret processes and formulas, good will, trademarks, tradebrands, franchises, and other like property. The gross amount of royalties is not reduced by any part of the cost of the rights under which the royalties are received or by any amount allowable as a deduction in computing taxable income.

Section 1.1362-2(c)(5)(ii)(A)(2) provides that “royalties” does not include royalties derived in the ordinary course of a trade or business of franchising or licensing property. Royalties received by a corporation are derived in the ordinary course of a trade or business of franchising or licensing property only if, based on all the facts and circumstances, the corporation (i) created the property; or (ii) performed significant services or incurred substantial costs with respect to the development or marketing of the property.

Section 1.1362-2(c)(5)(ii)(B)(1) provides that "rents" means amounts received for the use of, or the right to use, property (whether real or personal) of the corporation.

Section 1.1362-2(c)(5)(ii)(B)(2) provides that "rents" does not include rents derived in the active trade or business of renting property. Rents received by a corporation are derived in an active trade or business of renting property only if, based on all the facts and circumstances, the corporation provides significant services or incurs substantial costs in the rental business. Generally, significant services are not rendered and substantial costs are not incurred in connection with net leases. Whether significant services are performed or substantial costs are incurred in the rental business is determined based upon all the facts and circumstances including the number of persons employed to provide the services and the types and amounts of costs and expenses incurred (other than depreciation).

Based solely on the facts as represented by Company in this ruling request, we conclude that Company’s income from the Programming Agreement is not passive investment income under § 1362(d)(3)(C)(i).

The ruling in this letter is based on information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

Except for the specific ruling above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal income tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed regarding Company's eligibility to be an S corporation. In addition, no opinion is expressed regarding whether

4
PLR-109445-00

the payments from the Programming Agreement are royalties, rents, or both. Further, the passive investment income rules of § 1362 are completely independent of the passive activity rules of § 469; unless an exception under § 469 applies, any rental activity remains passive for purposes of § 469.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to Company.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to § 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,
/s/
Robert Honigman
Acting Assistant to the Chief, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

enclosure: copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace