PLR 200047016: IRS finds tax avoidance purpose in proposed loss of citizenship

Number
200047016
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Expatriation to Avoid Tax
Topics
Code sections
§ 877, § 2107, § 2501
Ruling dated
August 18, 2000
Publicly released
November 24, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A naturalized U.S. citizen who had reclaimed citizenship in his birth country planned to renounce U.S. citizenship. His net worth exceeded a threshold that could create a presumption of tax avoidance, and he sought a ruling that avoiding U.S. tax was not a principal purpose. The IRS accepted his submission as complete and made in good faith, but concluded that the information established a principal tax avoidance purpose. The letter does not disclose the facts behind that adverse finding. It states that the section 877 rules and related reporting duties would apply as described in the letter.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the proposed loss of U.S. citizenship avoid treatment under the expatriation tax rules?
  • Outcome: Denied: the IRS found a principal purpose of avoiding U.S. tax.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 877(a), 877(c), 2107, 2501(a)(3); Notice 98-34.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200047016
Release Date: 11/24/2000
Index No.: 877.00-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number

Refer Reply to
PLR-120896-98/CC:INTL:B1
Date:
August 18, 2000

A
=

Date B =
Year C =
Date D =
Year E =
Country F =

Dear

This is in response to your letter dated November 11, 1998, requesting a ruling under section 877(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("Code") that A’s loss of U.S. citizenship did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

A was born on Date B in Country F and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in Year C. A’s mother and father were citizens of Country F. During Date D, A reclaimed his Country F citizenship. A plans to renounce his United States citizenship during Year E. On the date of A's expatriation, his net worth will exceed the net worth prescribed in section 877(a)(2).

Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long-term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who "expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be taxed under section 877(b) and the special rules of section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501 (a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to
PLR-120896-98
2

avoid U.S. taxes.
A former citizen or former long term-resident will be treated as having expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of sections 877, 2107 and 2501 (a)(3) if the individual’s average income tax liability or the individual’s net worth on the date of expatriation exceed certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A) and 2501 (a)(3)(B).

A former U.S. citizen whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds these thresholds, however, will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen is described within certain statutory categories and submits a request for a ruling within one year of the date of loss of U.S. citizenship for the Secretary’s determination as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. See sections 877(c)(1), 2107(a)(2)(B) and 2501(a)(3)(C).

Under Notice 98-34, 1998-27 I.R.B. 40, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B.
394, an eligible former citizen will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

Notice 98-34 requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual’s expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

A is eligible to request a ruling pursuant to Notice 97-19 because A has become a citizen of the country in which he was born and in which his mother and father were born. See section 877(c)(2)(A)(ii)(I) and section 877(c)(2)(A)(ii)(III).

Accordingly, based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 98-34. However, we further conclude that A will, nevertheless, be treated under section 877(a)(1) as having as one of his principal purposes of expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes because the information submitted clearly established a principal purpose to avoid taxes under subtitle A or B of the Code.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to A’s U.S. tax liability for taxable periods prior to his loss of U.S. citizenship or for taxable periods after his loss of U.S. citizenship under sections of the Code other than sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3).

Because A is treated under section 877(a)(1) as having as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes, he must annually file a U.S. income tax return (Form 1040NR), with the information described in Notice 97-19,
PLR-120896-98
3

section VII, Annual Information Reporting, for each year in the 10-year period following expatriation if he is liable for U.S. tax under any provision of the Code, as modified by section 877. For purposes of computing the tax due under section 877, A must recognize the realized or unrealized gains as a result of any “exchange” described in section 877(d)(2)(B), (d)(2)(E)((i), or (d)(2)(E)(ii) in the year of the exchange. For further information, A should refer to the Instructions to Form 1040NR, U.S. Nonresident Income Tax Return.

A copy of this letter must be attached to A's U.S. income tax return for the year in which A obtained the ruling (whether or not A is otherwise required to file a return).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to A.

Sincerely yours,

_______
ALLEN GOLDSTEIN
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International)

cc: Director International
International District Operations OP:IN:D Chief, Examination Division

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace