PLR 200042012: Additional mergers and asset sales preserve earlier distribution rulings

Number
200042012
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Distribution of Stock and Securities of a Controlled Corporation
Code sections
§ 355
Ruling dated
July 18, 2000
Publicly released
October 20, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Taxpayers asked whether later steps would affect earlier IRS rulings on distributions of two controlled companies' stock and related transactions. The proposed steps moved an LLC interest through two holding companies, merged several LLCs and a partnership, and allowed sales or other dispositions of specified assets. The IRS ruled that all four steps would leave the earlier rulings in full force and effect. This supplemental letter does not restate the earlier rulings or separately decide the tax consequences of the later steps.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the later contributions, mergers, and possible asset disposals adversely affect the earlier distribution rulings?
  • Outcome: Approved: the earlier rulings would remain in full force and effect.
  • Key authorities: Prior IRS letter rulings PLR-121425-98 and PLR-107269-99, as identified in this supplement.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury

Number: 200042012
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 10/20/2000
Index Number: 0355.00-00 Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:Br4 PLR-107939-00
Date:
July 18, 2000

Controlled B
=

Holdco B1
=

Holdco B2
=

Holdco B3
=

Merger LLC A
=

Merger LLCB
=

Merger LLC C
=

Conversion LLC A =

Contribution LLC A =

Contribution LLC B =

Contribution LLC C =

Contribution LLC D =

Contribution LLC E =

Contribution LLC F =

Contribution LLC G =

Contribution LLC H =

New Partnership A =

New Partnership B =

PLR-107939-00
2

New Partnership C =

Partnership C
=

F Assets
=

G Assets
=

H Assets
=

This letter replies to your January 27, 2000 request that we further supplement our letter ruling dated March 30, 1999 (PLR-121425-98) (the "Original Letter Ruling"), as supplemented by our letter ruling dated April 28, 1999 (PLR-107269-99) (collectively, the "Prior Letter Rulings"). Capitalized terms not defined in this letter retain the meanings assigned them in the Original Letter Ruling.

The Prior Letter Rulings address certain federal income tax consequen- ces of the distributions by Distributing 2 of the stock of Controlled A and Controlled B and related transactions.

Summary of Facts

Controlled B wholly owns Holdco B1. Holdco B1 wholly owns Merger LLC A, Merger LLC B, Merger LLC C, Conversion LLC A, and Holdco B2. Merger LLC A wholly owns Contribution LLC A and Contribution LLC B. Contribution LLC A and Contribution LLC B, are the general partner and limited partner, respectively, of New Partnership A. Merger LLC B wholly owns Contribution LLC C and Contribution LLC D. Contribution LLC C and Contribution LLC D are the general partner and limited partner, respectively, of New Partnership B. New Partnership B owns F Assets. Conversion LLC A wholly owns Contribution LLC E and Contribution LLC F. Contribution LLC E and Contribution LLC F are the general partner and limited partner, respectively, of New Partnership C. New Partnership C owns H Assets. Merger LLC C owns G Assets.

Holdco B2 wholly owns Holdco B3. Holdco B3 wholly owns Contribution LLC G and Contribution LLC H. Contribution LLC G and Contribution LLC H are the general partner and limited partner, respectively, of Partnership C.

Proposed Transactions

For good business reasons, Controlled B has proposed the following transactions:

(i) Holdco B1 will contribute its ownership interest in Merger LLC A to Holdco B2.

PLR-107939-00
3

(ii) Holdco B2 will contribute its ownership interest in Merger LLC A, received from Holdco B1 in step (i), to Holdco B3.

(iii) Contribution LLC G will merge with and into Contribution LLC A, Contribution LLC H will merge with and into Contribution LLC B, and Partnership C will merge with and into New Partnership A. Following step (iii), Merger LLC A will continue to own all of the interests in Contribution LLC A and Contribution LLC B.

(iv) The F, G, and H Assets may be sold or otherwise disposed of.

Ruling

Based on the information submitted with the original and supplemental ruling requests, we rule that the transactions described in steps (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) above will not adversely affect any of the rulings contained in the Prior Letter Rulings, and the Prior Letter Rulings retain full force and effect.

Procedural Matters

This letter is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter should be attached to the federal income tax return of each affected taxpayer for the tax year in which the transactions covered by this letter are completed.

Under a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to each of your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate)
By:_____
Wayne T. Murray
Senior Technician/Reviewer
Branch 4

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace