PLR 200038029: S status continues after stock briefly held by ineligible owner

Number
200038029
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
June 23, 2000
Publicly released
September 22, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Two shareholders transferred their S corporation stock to an ineligible owner, causing the S election to terminate. After discovering the problem, the stock was returned to the original shareholders. The IRS found the termination inadvertent under section 1362(f) and treated the company as continuing to be an S corporation from the transfer date onward, provided no other event terminated its election. For federal tax purposes, the original shareholders would be treated as owning the stock during the intervening period. The corporation and its shareholders agreed to make required tax adjustments; the IRS expressed no opinion on whether the original S election was valid.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation retain S treatment despite temporary ownership by an ineligible shareholder?
  • Outcome: Approved as inadvertent termination relief from Date 2 onward, subject to no other termination.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b)(1), 1362(d)(2), 1362(f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury

Index Number: 1362.04-00 Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200038029
Person to Contact:
Release Date: 9/22/2000 Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:P&SI:1-PLR- 105653-00
Date:
June 23, 2000

Legend

X =

Y =

Date 1 =

Date 2 =

Date 3 =

State =

A =

B =

2
PLR- 105653-00

This responds to a letter dated March 6, 2000, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under section 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Facts

The information submitted discloses that X is a corporation organized under the laws of State on Date 1. On Date 2, A and B transferred their shares in X to Y, an ineligible shareholder. X’s S corporation election terminated effective Date 2. When X discovered that Y was an ineligible shareholder they submitted this request for a ruling.

X represents that the stock held by Y was distributed back to A and B on Date 3.
Further X represents that during the termination period it has timely and consistently filed its tax returns consistent with its treatment as an S corporation.

X and each person who was a shareholder of X during the termination period agree to make the adjustments (consistent with X's treatment as an S corporation) that are required by the Secretary with respect to the termination period. In addition, X represents that A and B have and shall continue to report their pro rata share of X’s items of income, loss, deduction and credit.

Law and Analysis

Section 1361(a)(1) defines an S corporation as a small business corporation for which an election under section 1362(a) is in effect. Section 1361(b)(1) defines "small business corporation" as a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and that does not (A) have more than 75 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, other than a trust described in section 1361(c)(2), and other than an organization described in (c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one class of stock.

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) of the Code provides that an election to be treated as an S corporation terminates whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) the corporation ceases to be a small business corporation. The termination is effective on and after the date the S corporation ceases to meet the requirements of a small business corporation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B).

Section 1362(f) of the Code provides that if (1) an election to be treated as an S corporation was terminated under section 1362(d) (2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the termination was inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the event resulting in such termination, steps were taken so that the corporation is once more a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation,

3
PLR- 105653-00

and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to this subsection, agrees to make the adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to that period, then, notwithstanding the terminating event, the corporation shall be treated as continuing to be an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

S. Rep. No. 640, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. 12-13 (1982), 1982-2 C.B. 718, 723-24, in discussing section 1362(f) of the Code, provides, in part, as follows:

If the Internal Revenue Service determines that a corporation’s subchapter S election is inadvertently terminated, the Service can waive the effect of the terminating event for any period if the corporation timely corrects the event and if the corporation and the shareholders agree to be treated as if the election had been in effect for such period.

The committee intends that the Internal Revenue Service be reasonable in granting waivers, so that corporations whose subchapter S eligibility requirements have been inadvertently violated do not suffer the tax consequences of a termination if no tax avoidance would result from the continued subchapter S treatment. In granting a waiver, it is hoped that taxpayers and the government will work out agreements that protect the revenues without undue hardship to taxpayers . . . It is expected that the waiver may be made retroactive for all years, or retroactive for the period in which the corporation again became eligible for subchapter S treatment, depending on the facts.

Conclusions

Based upon the information submitted and the representations set forth above, we conclude that the termination of X’s S corporation election was inadvertent within the meaning of section 1362(f).

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from Date 2 and thereafter, provided that X’s subchapter S election is not otherwise terminated under section 1362(d). In addition, for federal tax purposes, A and B will be treated as owning their shares in X during the period from Date 2 to Date 3.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of the above-described facts under any other provision of the Code. In particular, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning whether X’s S election was valid under section 1362.

4
PLR- 105653-00

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

/s/David R. Haglund

David R. Haglund
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace