PLR 200036023: Stock repurchase leaves earlier distribution rulings in force
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An earlier IRS ruling addressed internal and public distributions of a controlled company's stock, made in part so that company could raise equity for acquisitions. After the distributions, the company sold shares to the public and bought another business. It then proposed a program to repurchase up to a redacted number of shares on the open market. In this supplemental ruling, the IRS said that the repurchase program would not adversely affect any rulings in the earlier letter, which would remain in force. The IRS expressed no opinion on other tax effects of the repurchases.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Would the controlled company's proposed open market repurchases affect its earlier distribution rulings?
- Outcome: Approved: the earlier rulings would remain in full force and effect.
- Key authorities: IRC § 355; Rev. Proc. 96-30, § 4.05(1)(b).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Index Number: 0355.00-00 Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200036023
Person to Contact:
Release Date: 9/8/2000
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:CORP:4 PLR-108296-00
Date:
June 7, 2000
Company A =
Date A =
Date B =
j
=
k
=
l
=
m
=
This letter responds to your April 10, 2000 request for a supplement to our ruling letter issued February 24, 1998 (the “Ruling Letter”), as supplemented by a ruling letter issued February 10, 2000 (the “Supplemental Letter”). The information submitted for consideration is summarized below. Capitalized terms retain the meanings assigned them in the Ruling Letter.
The Ruling Letter addressed a series of transactions that included an internal distribution of Controlled stock to Distributing 2 (the “Internal Distribution”) followed by a distribution of the Controlled stock to the public shareholders of Distributing 2 (the “External Distribution”). These transactions were subsequently effected in reliance on the Ruling Letter. The principal business purpose for the distributions was to permit Controlled to raise additional equity for pursuing acquisitions. In the Ruling Letter, Distributing 2 represented that:
(2k ) Within one year following the External Distribution, Controlled (i) will issue at least f to g dollars of equity or equity-linked instruments in acquisitions or for cash, and (ii) will make at least f to g dollars of acquisitions (including any acquisitions made pursuant to (i)). Within five years following the External Distribution, and taking into account any issuances or acquisitions within the first year following the External Distribution, Controlled (iii) will issue at least h dollars of equity or equity-linked instruments in acquisitions or for cash and (iv) will make
PLR-108296-00
2
at least h dollars of acquisitions (including any acquisitions made pursuant to (iii)).
On Date A, Controlled sold j shares to the public and raised k dollars. On Date B, Controlled purchased Company A for l dollars.
Controlled wishes to initiate a program to repurchase up to m shares of its outstanding stock through open market transactions (the “Repurchase Program”). Controlled represents that the Repurchase Program will comply with the requirements of § 4.05(1)(b) of Rev. Proc. 96-30, 1996-1 C.B. 696, 705.
Based solely on the information submitted, we rule that the Repurchase Program will not adversely affect any of the rulings set forth in the Ruling Letter, and those rulings will retain full force and effect.
We express no opinion on the tax effects of the Repurchase Program under any other provisions of the Code and regulations or the tax effects of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the Repurchase Program that are not specifically covered by this supplemental ruling.
This supplemental ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it.
Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Each taxpayer involved in the transaction should attach a copy of this supplemental ruling, along with copies of the Ruling Letter and Supplemental Letter, to the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for the taxable year in which the transaction is consummated.
Under a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Assistant Chief Counsel
(Corporate)
By: Wayne T. Murray
Senior Technician/Reviewer
Branch 4
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace