PLR 200033040: Late branch tax elections receive a 30 day extension

Number
200033040
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Branch Tax
Code sections
§ 884
Ruling dated
May 23, 2000
Publicly released
August 18, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer missed the deadline for its first U.S. federal income tax return after failing to request an automatic filing extension. It discovered before filing that the late return would make its elections under the branch tax regulation invalid, and it sought more time. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the standards for discretionary relief under Treasury Regulation section 301.9100-3. It granted 30 days from the ruling date to make the elections under section 1.884-2T(d)(4), while leaving the taxpayer's underlying eligibility for those elections undecided.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer make branch tax elections after its return filing deadline?
  • Outcome: Approved: a 30 day extension to make the elections.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.884-2T(d)(4), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Index Number: 9100.22-00
Washington, DC 20224
884.00-00
Number: 200033040
Person to Contact:
Release Date: 8/18/2000
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-116178-99
Date:
May 23, 2000

LEGEND

Taxpayer
=

Date A
=

Date B
=

Year One
=

Dear :

This replies to a letter dated September 22, 1999, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make elections under § 1.884- 2T(d)(4) for Year One. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

You state that Taxpayer’s first United States federal income tax return was due on Date A. You further state that Taxpayer was eligible for an automatic extension of time to file its return for Year One and that due to an inadvertent oversight, Taxpayer failed to file its request for an automatic extension of time to file its tax return for Year One.

On Date B, which was after Date A, prior to filing its tax return for Year One, Taxpayer discovered that its failure to timely file its tax return for Year One would render invalid any election under § 1.884-2T(d)(4) made with its late-filed tax return for Year One. Accordingly, Taxpayer included a statement with its tax return for Year One stating its intentions to file a request for section 9100 relief to enable it to make valid § 884 elections for Year One. The IRS did not discover Taxpayer’s failure to timely file elections under § 1.884-2T(d)(4) before this request for relief was filed.

2

PLR-116178-99

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 provides standards for extensions of time for making regulatory elections when the deadline for making the election is other than a due date prescribed by statute.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, § 1.884-2T(d)(4) fixes the time to make the elections. Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100–1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies
§ 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to make elections under § 1.884-2T(d)(4) for Year One. The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the elections. § 301.9100-1(a).

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the elections.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,
/s/ Allen Goldstein, Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace