CCA 200032003: Bankruptcy makes a pending compromise offer nonprocessable

Number
200032003
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT
Code sections
§ 7122
Ruling dated
March 27, 2000
Publicly released
August 11, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that the IRS may return an offer in compromise as nonprocessable if the taxpayer files for bankruptcy before the IRS accepts or rejects it. It also advised that a bankruptcy filing makes the appeal of a rejected offer moot, so that offer may be returned as nonprocessable too. The memorandum relies on IRS procedures governing offers from taxpayers in bankruptcy and cites a temporary regulation under section 7122. It leaves questions about the IRS's discretion and the bankruptcy automatic stay for a later memorandum.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What happens to an offer in compromise or an appeal of its rejection when the taxpayer files for bankruptcy?
  • Outcome: Advice given. The IRS may return the pending offer as nonprocessable, and bankruptcy renders the appeal of a rejected offer moot.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. § 301.7122-1T(e)(5); IRM 5.8.3.1, 5.8.10.2.1, and 5.9.4.7.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
March 27, 2000

Number: 200032003
GL-610467-99/CC:EL:GL:B2
Release Date: 8/11/2000
UILC: 17.00.00-00
9999.98-00

MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRICT COUNSEL, INDIANA

FROM: Kathryn A. Zuba
Chief, Branch 2 (General Litigation)

SUBJECT: Offers-in-Compromise - Effect of Bankruptcy on
Processability

This memorandum responds to your memorandum dated January 10, 2000. You ask that we pre-review your memorandum to Acting Chief, Special Procedures Branch, Indiana District. This document is not to be cited as precedent.

We agree with your conclusion that the Service can return as nonprocessable an offer in compromise that has not been accepted or rejected as of the date of the filing of the taxpayer’s bankruptcy petition. As you discussed, Service procedures provide that offers based on doubt as to collectibility or effective tax administration from taxpayers in bankruptcy are nonprocessable. IRM 5.8.3.1, IRM 5.8.10.2.1, IRM 5.9.4.7. See also Treas. Reg. 301.7122-1T(e)(5). However, with respect to taxpayers who file for bankruptcy after appealing a rejected offer, we disagree that Appeals must consider appeals of rejected offers even though the taxpayer has filed bankruptcy. Because Service procedures provide that offers from taxpayers in bankruptcy are nonprocessable, the appeal of a rejected offer is rendered moot by the bankruptcy filing. The offer can therefore be returned as nonprocessable.

Your memorandum also raises the issues decided in In re Mills, 240 B.R. 689 (Bankr. S.D. W.V. 1999), and In re Chapman, 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 1091 (S.D. W.V. June 23, 1999) concerning the Service’s discretion with regard to offers in compromise from taxpayers in bankruptcy, and the impact of the automatic stay on the investigation of such an offers. We are currently in the process of developing our litigating position with regard to the issues raised in Mills and Chapman. We will respond to you in a detailed supplemental memorandum after our final position is reached.

If you have any questions, contact the attorney assigned to this matter at (202) 622- 3620.

cc: Assistant Regional Counsel (GL), Southeast Region

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace