PLR 200029055: ESOP holdings of S corporation stock avoid unrelated business tax

Number
200029055
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Unrelated Business Taxable Income (Taxable v. Not Taxable); Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plan; Qualifications for Tax Credit Employee Stock Ownership Plans; Tax on Prohibited Transactions
Code sections
§ 401, § 409, § 501, § 512, § 1361, § 1366, § 4975
Ruling dated
April 24, 2000
Publicly released
July 21, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An employer's stock was held by an employee stock ownership plan and by the ESOP component of a second retirement plan. The employer proposed electing S corporation status and asked whether the plans' stock holdings and related income would trigger unrelated business income tax. The IRS ruled that the ESOP exception in section 512(e)(3) applied under current law after the S election took effect. Its conclusions assumed both plans remained qualified, their trusts remained tax exempt, and the shares qualified as employer securities. The IRS did not address possible changes under proposed legislation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does section 512(e)'s unrelated business income rule apply to employer stock held by the two ESOP arrangements after an S election?
  • Outcome: Approved under current law and the stated qualification assumptions.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a), 409(l), 501(a), 512(e), 1361(c)(6), 1366(a), and 4975(e)(7).

Full text (IRS public release)

200029055

Internal Revenue Service                 Department of the Treasury
                                         Washington, DC 20224

UIL: 512.00-00
     401.00-00
     409.00-00
     4975.00-00
In Reference to: T:EP:RA:T1
Date: APR 24 2000

Legend:
Company A =
Plan X =
Plan Y =

Dear

This is in response to a letter dated November 5, 1999, as supplemented by correspondence
dated February 1, 2000, submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative requesting
rulings under section 512(e)(1) and (e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The
following facts and representations were submitted in connection with your request.

Effective January 1, 1975, Company A established an employee stock ownership plan
(“ESOP”) qualified under sections 401(a), 409 and 4975(e)(7) of the Code (Plan Y). Plan Y has
a favorable determination letter issued on April 20, 1995. Effective January 1, 1985, Company A
established Plan X, a profit-sharing plan which includes a qualified cash or deferred arrangement
under section 401(k) of the Code. Plan X also has a determination letter, issued on June 30,
1995. During the 1999 plan year, Plan X and Plan Y (collectively, the “Plans”) were amended
and restated to comply with federal tax legislation affecting qualified plans.

Plan X permits employees to choose among six options for the investment of elective deferrals,
including a Company A stock fund. Effective January 1, 1999, Plan X was also amended to
provide that the portion of a participant’s account that is invested in Company A stock
(“Company A Stock Fund”) constitutes an ESOP account under sections 409 and 4975(e)(7) of
the Code. Specifically, each ESOP account consists of: (1) the portion of each participant’s
account that was invested in the Company A Stock Fund as of January 1, 1999; (2) any additional
elective deferrals that are invested in the Company A Stock Fund on or after the amendment’s
effective date; (3) any amounts that were invested at any time in the Company A Stock Fund on
or after the effective date, with adjustments for income, withdrawals, contributions and expenses;
and (4) any matching contributions made in Company A stock on or after the effective date.

-2- 200029055

Effective December 15, 1999, any participant with an investment in the Company A Stock Fund
will be restricted from transferring amounts held in the fund to any of the other investment funds
offered under Plan X except as may be necessary to satisfy the diversification requirements.
Following these and other amendments, the ESOP component of Plan X is intended to be a stock
bonus plan which will comply with the ESOP requirements. Favorable determination letters will
again be requested for Plan X, including the ESOP component, and for Plan Y.

As of the date of your ruling request, Company A had a total of 48,679 shares of common
stock issued and outstanding, 6,864 of which are owned by the ESOP component of Plan X and
41,815 shares owned by Plan Y. Thus, all of the outstanding common stock of Company A is
owned by Plans X and Y. A total of 38,952 shares are allocated to participants’ and former
employees’ accounts under the Plans, with stock ownership per account ranging from .06 percent
to 15 percent of the total number of shares outstanding. Each share of Company A stock has
identical voting and dividend rights, and you represent that all of the authorized, issued and
outstanding shares of stock of Company A qualify as employer securities under section 409(l) of
the Code. On or before March 15, 2000, Company A will file an S election with the Internal
Revenue Service with an effective date of January 1, 2000.

Based on the above facts and representations, you request the following rulings:

(1) The Company A stock held by the ESOP component of Plan X and by Plan Y will not be
treated as an interest in an unrelated trade or business under section 512(e)(1)(A) of the Code, or
any corresponding successor provision, following Company A’s S election effective for the tax
year beginning on January 1, 2000.

(2) All of the income of Company A and gain realized from the disposition of Company A
stock passed through to the ESOP component of Plan X and to Plan Y will be exempt from the
unrelated business income tax (UBIT) under section 512(e)(1) of the Code, or any corresponding
successor provision, based on the exemption under section 512(e)(3), or any corresponding
successor provision, following the effective date of Company A’s S election.

Section 512(e)(1)(A) and (B) of the Code provides that if an organization described in section
1361(c)(6) holds stock in an S corporation, such interest shall be treated as interest in an
unrelated trade or business, and notwithstanding any other provision of Part I (General Rule) of
Subchapter F (Exempt Organizations), all items of income, loss, or deduction taken into account
under section 1366(a), and any gain or loss on the disposition of the stock in the S corporation,
shall be taken into account in computing the UBIT of such organization.

Section 1361(c)(6) of the Code refers to a qualified trust described in section 401(a) and
exempt from taxation under section 501(a) as one of the types of exempt organizations permitted
to be a shareholder of an S corporation. Section 1366(a) provides rules for determining the tax of
a shareholder of an S corporation.

-3- 200029055

Section 512(e)(3) of the Code provides that section 512(e) does not apply to employer
securities (as defined under section 409(l)) held by an ESOP described under section 4975(e)(7).

Section 409(1) of the Code generally defines employer securities to mean common stock issued
by the employer which is readily tradeable on an established securities market, or if there is no
such stock, common stock issued by the employer which has a combination of voting power and
dividend rights at least equal to that class of common stock of the employer having the greatest
voting power and that class of common stock having the greatest dividend power.

Regarding ruling request (1), we conclude that based on current law, the S corporation stock
held by the ESOP component of Plan X and by Plan Y is not treated as an interest in an unrelated
trade or business under sections 512(e)(1)(A) and 512(e)(3) of the Code following the effective
date of Company A’s S election. Regarding ruling request (2), we further conclude that, because
you represent that Company A stock qualifies as employer securities within the meaning of
section 409(l), the exemption provided under section 512(e)(1)(B) applies with respect to the
Company A stock held by Plans X and Y beginning on the effective date of the S election.
However, section 6.09 of Rev. Proc. 2000-4, 2000-1 I.R.B. 115 provides that the Service will not
rule on the tax effects of proposed legislation. Thus, the above rulings are limited to the
exemption provided by current law.

The above rulings are based on the assumption that Plan X and Plan Y are qualified under
sections 401(a) and 4975(e)(7) of the Code, and that their related trusts are exempt under section
501(a), at all relevant times. In addition, these rulings also assume that the stock of Company A
held by the Plans qualifies as employer securities within the meaning of section 409(l).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.


-4- 200029055

A copy of this ruling has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a
power of attorney on file in this office.

Sincerely yours,
[signature]

John Swieca, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division

Enclosure:
Deleted copy of the ruling
Notice 437

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace