PLR 200029020: Wrongful death settlement excluded from estate income

Number
200029020
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Compensation for Injuries and Sickness (Excluded v. Not Excluded)
Code sections
§ 104
Ruling dated
April 18, 2000
Publicly released
July 21, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An estate received an insurance settlement after the decedent died from injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The executor asked whether the settlement was taxable income to the estate. The IRS concluded that the full amount could be excluded under section 104(a)(2) because it compensated for wrongful death caused by physical injuries. The ruling rested on the stated facts and did not address other tax consequences.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the estate exclude its wrongful death settlement from income?
  • Outcome: Approved; the full settlement was excludable.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 104(a)(2).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Index No.: 104.00-00
Washington, DC 20224

Person to Contact:
Number: 200029020
Release Date: 7/21/2000
Identifying Number:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:IT&A:2 – PLR-119714-99
Date: April 18, 2000

Legend:
B=
X=

Dear
:

This is in reply to a request for a ruling dated November 5, 1999, submitted by your authorized representative as to whether § 104 of the Internal Revenue Code allows a decedent’s estate (“B”) to exclude a settlement of a wrongful death claim from federal income tax. You are the executor of B.

The information submitted indicates that the decedent died in the State of as a result of physical injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The decedent was a passenger in the automobile, and in 1999 B received $X from the driver’s insurance company “in settlement of the wrongful death.” The settlement agreement refers to decedent’s “bodily and personal injuries, damage to property, and the consequences
thereof.” The
statutes provide compensatory formulas for the computation of
damages.

Section 104(a)(2) provides that gross income does not include damages received (whether by suit or agreement and whether as lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness.

The legislative history of § 104 makes it clear that damages (other than punitive damages) received on account of a claim of wrongful death are excludable from income. H. R. Conf. Rep. No. 104-737, 104th Cong., 2d Sess., 301 (1996).

The decedent died as a result of physical injuries suffered in an automobile accident, and B received $X as compensation for the decedent’s wrongful death. Accordingly, we conclude that B may exclude the full amount of the settlement from income tax.
Caveats:

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Deputy Assistant Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)

By
George Baker
Assistant to Branch Chief, Branch 2

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace