CCA 200025051: Conditions for a proposed closing agreement with a Canadian company

Number
200025051
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Closing Agreements
Code sections
§ 882, § 6651, § 7121
Ruling dated
April 26, 2000
Publicly released
June 23, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel reviewed a proposed closing agreement involving a Canadian corporation and employees who worked in the United States. It found the draft acceptable in principle, but said the corporation and employees must be identified before the Commissioner signs it. The field office also had to confirm the company's examination status and obtain unredacted returns and employee information. Once signed, the agreement would require payroll tax filings and payments and other information concerning U.S. tax issues. The memorandum advises on the proposed agreement; it does not state that one was executed.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is the proposed closing agreement acceptable, and what must happen before and after signing?
  • Outcome: Advice given; acceptable in principle subject to identification and other steps.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 882(c), 6651, and 7121.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

April 26, 2000

Number: 200025051
FREV-101828-00
Release Date: 6/23/2000
CC:INTL:Br1
UIL: 7121.00-00

MEMORANDUM FOR Assistant Commissioner (International) OP:IN Attn: Mr. Rob Stanchik, Examination Branch

FROM: John M. Staples, Assistant Chief Counsel
Associate Chief Counsel (International) CC:INTL

SUBJECT: Proposed Closing Agreement

Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed the closing agreement that taxpayer’s counsel forwarded to our offices on April 8, 2000. As you know, this is the culmination of discussions between our offices and taxpayer’s representatives that have extended over a period of more than six months.

In our view, the draft closing agreement is acceptable as an agreement in principle. However, it should be entered into on behalf of the Commissioner only after the Canadian corporation reveals its identity and the identities of its alien employees who performed services in the United States for compensation during the relevant periods. As you know, the Internal Revenue Service does not enter into closing agreements with anonymous taxpayers. In addition, prior to signing the closing agreement, your office should

• confirm that the Canadian corporation is not presently under examination and has not been notified of the initiation of any such examination;

• obtain from the Canadian corporation unredacted copies of the Forms 1120F, including Forms 8833, that it filed with the IRS for taxable years ended March 31, 1997 through March 31, 1999; and

• a list of the names and addresses of the Canadian corporation’s employees who received compensation for services performed in the United States during 1997, 1998, and 1999.

After the closing agreement is executed for the Commissioner and for the taxpayer, the latter will be required to produce information and documents, including the following:
2

• Forms 941 for quarters ended March 31, 1997 through March 31, 2000, with payment of the income tax withholding and FICA liabilities reflected on these returns;

• payment of its FUTA liabilities for quarters ended March 31, 1997 through March 31, 2000;

• if requested by the IRS, Forms W-2 for employees subject to U.S. income tax on compensation paid by the Canadian corporation for services performed in the United States;

• information requested by the IRS to determine if the Canadian corporation maintained a permanent establishment in the United States for any open years;

• information requested by the IRS concerning issues arising under I.R.C. sec.
882(c) for any year for which the Canadian corporation did not file a protective return, as well as information concerning penalties imposed under I.R.C. sec. 6651 with respect to a taxpayer’s failure to file U.S. income tax returns or to pay over any U.S. income taxes; and

• information concerning the residency status of the alien employees of the Canadian corporation.

It is our view that the draft closing agreement provides a basis for resolving the outstanding issues and fully protects the interests of the Internal Revenue Service. The closing agreement also brings noncompliant taxpayers back into the federal tax system and reasonably ensures future compliance.

If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me, Ed Williams (622-3268), or Leslie Rubenstein (622-4409).

JOHN M. STAPLES

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace