PLR 200023039: Extra time to file dual consolidated loss agreements

Number
200023039
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
March 14, 2000
Publicly released
June 9, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A domestic company owned foreign entities that generated losses it sought to deduct under the dual consolidated loss rules. Its accounting firm prepared the consolidated tax return but failed to attach the required agreement and certifications. The firm discovered the omission while preparing a later return. The IRS found that the company met the standards for an extension under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 and gave it 30 days from the ruling date to file the missing documents. The IRS expressly did not decide whether the company was otherwise eligible to make the election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the company file its dual consolidated loss agreement and certifications after the deadline?
  • Outcome: Approved a 30 day extension from the ruling date.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1503(d)(2); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) and 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Index Number: 9100.22-00
Washington, DC 20224
1503.04-04
Number: 200023039
Person to Contact:
Release Date: 6/9/2000
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR:117858-99
Date:
In re: March 14, 2000

LEGEND

Taxpayer
=

Entity (1), (2), (3), (4) =
(Collectively, “Entities”)

CPA Firm
=

Date A
=

Date B
=

Dear

This replies to a letter dated October 25, 1999, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the agreement and certifications described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) for the losses incurred by Entities for the fiscal year ended on Date A. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

During the fiscal year ended on Date A, Taxpayer was the domestic owner of the foreign Entities, which generated federal tax losses. Taxpayer represents that each Entity constitutes a separate unit as described in § 1.1503-2(c)(3)(i). Taxpayer further represents that it was eligible to file the election described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2) to claim the deduction for the dual consolidated losses of these Entities for the fiscal year ended on Date A. 2

In re: PLR:117858-99

Taxpayer relied on CPA Firm for tax advice, including the filing requirements involving the use of losses under I.R.C. § 1503(d)(2). CPA Firm prepared Taxpayer’s Form 1120 consolidated tax return for the fiscal year ended on Date A but failed to attach the required statements to Form 1120 as required by § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i). During the preparation of Form 1120 for the short year ended on Date B, CPA Firm realized that a dual consolidated loss statement should have been filed with the prior fiscal year’s return.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I under the standards set forth in
§ 301.9100-3

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 provides standards for extensions of time for making regulatory elections.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) fixes the time to file the agreement and certifications. Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under
§ 301.9100–1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the agreement and certifications described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) for the losses incurred by Entities for the fiscal year ended on Date A. The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election. § 301.9100-1(a).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented. 3

In re: PLR:117858-99

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to Taxpayer.

Sincerely,
/s/ Allen Goldstein
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace