PLR 200021028: Consented S election revocation was not inadvertent

Number
200021028
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362
Ruling dated
February 22, 2000
Publicly released
May 26, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation asked the IRS to treat the termination of its S corporation election as inadvertent under IRC § 1362(f). The election had been revoked by letter, and the corporation's sole shareholder had consented to that revocation. The IRS ruled that the termination by revocation under § 1362(d)(1) was not an inadvertent termination. It gave no ruling on other federal tax consequences.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the consented revocation of the S election be treated as an inadvertent termination?
  • Outcome: Denied.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(a), 1362(d)(1), and 1362(f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Index Number: 1362.04-00 Washington, DC 20224

Person to Contact:
Number: 200021028
Telephone Number:
Release Date: 5/26/2000
Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:P&SI:3 PLR-117796-99
Date:
February 22, 2000

Company:

Shareholder:

a:
b:

This letter responds to your letter dated October 5, 1999, as well as subsequent correspondence, in which you request a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code that the termination of Company's S corporation election was inadvertent.

Under § 1361(a)(1), the term “S corporation” means, with respect to any tax year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for the year. Section 1361(a)(2) defines the term “C corporation”, with respect to any tax year, as a corporation that is not an S corporation for that year.

Section 1362(d) provides that an election under § 1362(a) terminates if--

(1) the corporation revokes with the consent of shareholders owning a majority of the shares,
(2) the corporation ceases to be a small business corporation, or
(3) the corporation has accumulated earnings and profits and has passive investment income exceeding 25 percent of gross receipts for 3 consecutive tax years.

Regarding any corporation whose election under § 1362(a) was terminated 2

PLR-117796-99

under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), § 1362(f) permits the Service to treat such a corporation as an S corporation despite the termination if, among other things, the Service determines that the circumstances resulting in termination were inadvertent.

Company's S corporation election was revoked by letter dated a, to be effective for the first tax year beginning after b. Shareholder, owning 100 percent of Company’s shares, consented to the revocation. We rule that this termination by revocation under § 1362(d)(1) is not an inadvertent termination.

Except for the specific ruling above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal income tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to § 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

WILLIAM P. O'SHEA
Chief, Branch 3
Office of Assistant Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

enclosure: copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace