CCA 200020005: Sheltered work program participants may be employees for tax purposes

Number
200020005
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Common Law Tests; Employee v. Not an Employee
Code sections
§ 3121, § 3401
Ruling dated
January 31, 2000
Publicly released
May 19, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A tax exempt organization provided training and sheltered work for people with developmental disabilities. Participants were paid by the piece and received no vacation, bonuses, or employee benefits. Field Service Advice concluded that participants were employees for federal employment tax purposes to the extent their activities resembled the second class of workers in Rev. Rul. 65-165. The IRS saw no material distinction from workers in an earlier technical advice memorandum. It declined to adopt a proposed test based on a participant's level of functioning because that approach was inconsistent with the Service's published position.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Are participants in the sheltered employment program employees for federal employment tax purposes?
  • Outcome: Advice given: yes, to the extent their activities match the described class of workers.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 3121, 3401; Rev. Rul. 65-165; TAM 9801003.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I NTERNAL REVENUE SERVI CE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
January 31, 2000

Number: 200020005
Release Date: 5/19/2000
CC:EBEO:Br6
TL-N-6458-99
UILC: 3121.04-01, 3401.04-02

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE

MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRICT COUNSEL, KENTUCKY-TENNESSEE DISTRICT, NASHVILLE
Attn: Vicki Miller

FROM: Chief, Branch 6 CC:EBEO:BR6
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits and Exempt Organizations)

SUBJECT:
This Field Service Advice responds to your memorandum dated November 26, 1999. Field Service Advice is not binding on Examination or Appeals and is not a final case determination. This document is not to be cited as precedent.

LEGEND

X=
ISSUE

Whether developmentally disabled individuals in the sheltered employment program of X are employees for federal employment tax purposes.

CONCLUSION

Developmentally disabled individuals in the sheltered employment program of X are employees for federal employment tax to the extent their activities most closely resemble those of the second class of individuals described in Rev. Rul. 65-165.

FACTS
X is a non-profit organization which is exempt from taxation under Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3). X maintains sheltered employment and supported living programs. The subject of this FSA is the sheltered employment program.

2

X provides training, job placement and on-site employment for individuals (clients) who are developmentally disabled. X asserts that its goal is to provide a therapeutic program for developmentally disabled clients to become self-sufficient by improving social skills and self help. Disabled individuals are initially evaluated for current and future employment potential and clients adjustment needs. Evaluation methods include observation, works samples, psychological evaluations, community skills profiles and inhouse assessment document profile. The vocational evaluation program lasts approximately six weeks. Thereafter, clients are placed in a work program most suited to their skills. The clients of X sheltered employment program are paid on a piece-rate basis and do not receive vacation, raises, bonuses or employee benefits. X admits that 50% of the developmentally disabled individuals remain in the sheltered employment program for an indefinite period of time.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

We see no material distinction between the activities of the clients in X’s sheltered employment program and the activities of the individuals held to be employees in Technical Advice Memorandum 9801003. Therefore, the position as described in Rev. Rul. 65-165 is applicable to X.

CASE DEVELOPMENT, HAZARDS AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

In your incoming memorandum, you suggest that the appropriate solution to these cases is to develop a “functionality” standard to determine the level at which a client would be deemed to be an employee. We are aware of various alternative approaches such as this. However, these approaches are not consistent with the position of the Service as announced in Rev. Rul. 65-165

Please call Lisa Tavares at 202-622-6090 if you have any questions.

___
HARRY BEKER

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace