PLR 200017035: Planned stock buybacks did not change prior spin off ruling

Number
200017035
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Spin-Off
Code sections
§ 355
Ruling dated
February 1, 2000
Publicly released
April 28, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation had received an earlier ruling that distributions of two subsidiaries' shares to its stockholders qualified under section 355. It then planned to repurchase some of its own shares through open market purchases and a tender offer. The corporation represented that the combined purchases would stay below 20 percent of its outstanding stock and that the tender offer would not buy shares from its officers or directors. The IRS ruled that this added information did not adversely affect the earlier ruling, which remained in force. The earlier ruling's full facts and caveats were incorporated by reference and are not reproduced in this supplemental letter.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the planned stock repurchases change the prior section 355 ruling?
  • Outcome: Approved: the prior ruling remained in force on the stated representations.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 355; Rev. Proc. 96-30, § 4.05(1)(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Index Number: 0351.01-00, 0355.01-00 Washington, DC 20224

Number: 200017035
Person to Contact:
Release Date: 4/28/2000
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:CORP:5 PLR-100246-00
Date:
February 1, 2000

In Re:

Distributing 2 =

Controlled 1 =

Controlled 2 =

:

This letter responds to your December 29, 1999, request for a letter ruling supplementing our letter ruling dated August 2, 1999 (the “Prior Letter Ruling”). In the Prior Letter Ruling, we ruled that the pro-rata distributions of all the outstanding common stock of Controlled 1 and Controlled 2 to the stockholders of Distributing 2 qualified as tax-free distributions under § 355 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Distributions”). The legend abbreviations (except as noted above), the summery of the facts, the description of the proposed transactions, the representations, and the caveats appearing in the Prior Letter Ruling are incorporated herein by reference.

In the Prior Letter Ruling, Distributing 2 represented that any share repurchases made by Distributing 2 after the Distributions would meet the requirements of section 4.05(1)(b) of Rev. Proc. 96-30, 1996-1 C.B. 696, 705. Distributing 2 now intends to make such repurchases through a combination of open market purchases and a tender

2
PLR-100246-00

offer. Distributing 2 represents that there is no plan or intention for such combined purchases by Distributing 2 to equal or exceed 20 percent of the total outstanding stock of Distributing 2 or for Distributing 2 to purchase shares pursuant to the tender offer from any of Distributing 2’s officers or directors.

Based solely on the information and representations submitted in the original and supplemental requests, we rule that the additional information and representation will have no adverse effect on the Prior Letter Ruling and that the Prior Letter Ruling retains full force and effect.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Each taxpayer affected by the Prior Letter Ruling should attach a copy of the that letter and of this supplemental letter to its federal income tax return for the taxable year in which the transactions covered by these letters are completed.

Under a power of attorney on file in this office, copies of this supplemental letter are being sent to the taxpayer and its authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate)

By: _
Filiz A. Serbes
Assistant to the Chief, Branch 5

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace