PLR 200012015: Appointed trust's S election steps preserve GST exemption

Number
200012015
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Tax On Generation Skipping Transfers
Code sections
§ 2601, § 2041, § 1361
Ruling dated
November 15, 1999
Publicly released
March 24, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A son exercised limited testamentary powers over two older irrevocable trusts after September 25, 1985, directing property into three trusts for beneficiaries and their descendants. The IRS found that the appointment did not count as a later addition under the generation-skipping transfer tax grandfather rule. One trust held stock in a corporation planning an S election. The trustee's consent to that election, election of small business trust treatment, and shareholder agreement would not change the beneficiaries' interests or end the GST exemption. Distributions to skip persons would remain exempt if no other additions occurred after September 25, 1985. The IRS did not decide whether the trust qualified as an electing small business trust.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the appointment or proposed S election steps end the trust's GST exemption?
  • Outcome: Approved for GST purposes on the stated no-additions facts.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2601, 2041(b), and 1361(e); Treas. Reg. § 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Number: 200012015 Release Date: 3/24/2000 P.O. Box 7604
Index No.: 2601.00-00
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044

Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:P&SI:4/PLR-105093-99

November 15, 1999
Re:

Legend:
Grandparent 1 =
Grandparent 2 =
Trust 1 =
Trust 2 =
Son
=
Son’s will =
Trust A =
Beneficiary =
Trustee =
Date 1 =
Date 2 =
x
=
Corporation =

Dear :
This is in response to your letter dated February 26, 1999, in which you requested a ruling regarding the application of the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax provisions of Chapter 13 of the Internal Revenue Code. Specifically, you requested a ruling that the exempt status of Trust A for GST tax purposes would not be affected by the following: (i) the Trustee’s consent to Corporation’s S election on behalf of Trust A; (ii) the Trustee’s execution of an "electing small business trust" election on behalf of Trust A; and (iii) the Trustee’s execution of the shareholder agreement on behalf of Trust A.

According to your submission, on Date 1, Grandparent 1 transferred x shares of Corporation common stock to Trust 1, an irrevocable trust. On the same date, Grandparent 2 transferred x shares of Corporation common stock to Trust 2, an irrevocable trust. Pursuant to the terms of the trust agreements, both Trust 1 and Trust 2 were divided into four separate trusts of equal value for the benefit of Grandparents’ four children, including Son.

Article 2(h) of both Trust 1 and Trust 2 states that upon the death of a child, the trust estate of such child as then
PLR-105093-99
-2-
constituted shall be held in trust for the benefit of, or distributed to or in trust for the benefit of, any one or more of such child’s descendants, in such amount and in such manner and upon such terms and conditions as such child shall appoint by his or her last will, specifically referring to the power of appointment conferred upon him or her.

Article 2(m) of Trust 1 states that any trust created under the terms of Trust 1 shall terminate not later than twenty-one years after the death of the last survivor of Grandparent 1's descendants living on Date 1.

Article 2(m) of Trust 2 states that any trust created under the terms of Trust 2 shall terminate not later than twenty-one years after the death of the last survivor of Grandparent 2's descendants living on Date 1.

Son died testate on Date 2, after September 25, 1985. In his will, Son exercised the testamentary power of appointment granted to him under Article 2(h) of Trust 1 and Article 2(h) of Trust 2 by directing that the property subject to such powers be divided into three trusts of equal value, one of which is Trust A for the benefit of Beneficiary and her descendants.

Article 4, Section 4.1 of Son’s will provides the terms of the three trusts. The trustee is to pay to the beneficiary for whom a trust is named, and his or her descendants, or any one or more of them from time to time living, such part or all of the income and principal of the trust (even though exhausting the trust) at such time or times and in such equal or unequal proportions among them as the trustee believes desirable for the best interests and welfare of such beneficiary and his or her descendants in that order and as a group, considering the desirability of supplementing their respective incomes or assets and all other circumstances and factors the trustee believes pertinent. Any undistributed income of a trust shall be accumulated and from time to time added to principal.

Pursuant to Article 4, Section 4.2 of Son’s will, if a beneficiary, living at or born after Son’s death, for whom a trust is named, dies before the time fixed by Son’s will for the complete distribution of the trust, then on the death of such beneficiary, the principal of the trust and all accrued or undistributed income shall be distributed to or for the benefit of such of Son’s descendants then living or thereafter born, in such proportions and subject to such trusts, powers, and conditions as such beneficiary may provide and appoint by will.

Article 4, Section 4.3 provides that on the death of the beneficiary for whom a trust is named, or on the division date, if he or she then is deceased, any principal of the trust not
PLR-105093-99
-3-
effectively disposed of shall be allocated per stirpes among the then living descendants of the beneficiary, if any. If there are no such descendants, the trust estate, or the part not effectively appointed, shall be distributed per stirpes among the then living descendants of the nearest lineal ancestor of the beneficiary who also was a descendant of Son and of whom one or more descendants then are living, or if none, per stirpes among Son’s then living descendants. Each share allocated to a beneficiary for whom a trust then held is named shall be added to that trust, and each share allocated to any other beneficiary shall be retained in trust as a separate trust named for him or her.
Article 4, Section 4.5 of Son’s will provides that notwithstanding any other provisions of Son’s will, on the day next preceding the end of twenty-one years after the death of the last to die of the descendants of Grandparent 1, living on Date 1, the trustee shall distribute any property then held in a trust to the beneficiary for whom the trust is named.

The primary asset of Trust A is stock in Corporation, a C corporation. The Corporation’s Board of Directors proposes to elect to treat Corporation as a small business corporation (an "S corporation"). Trustee proposes to consent to the S election. In order to convert Corporation to an S corporation, each of its shareholders must be eligible to hold S corporation stock as of the first day of the year for which the election is to take effect. Trustee proposes to make an election under § 1361(e)(3) to treat Trust A as an electing small business trust so that it can qualify as an eligible S corporation shareholder.

In an effort to ensure the continuing qualification of Corporation as an S corporation, Trustee intends to enter into a shareholder agreement with Corporation and Corporation’s other shareholders to protect the S election.

Under the Section 3(a) of the proposed shareholder agreement, no shareholder may transfer, and no person may acquire, the legal or beneficial ownership of any share if such transfer or acquisition would cause the S status of the Corporation to terminate. Specifically, no transfer may be made to any person that is not eligible to be a shareholder of an S corporation under the applicable provisions of the Code as in effect at the time of the purported transfer. In addition, no shareholder may affirmatively transfer shares to a person if the transfer would cause the Corporation to exceed the maximum number of persons who are allowable S corporation shareholders.

Section 3(b) of the proposed shareholder agreement provides that no shareholder shall make any transfer of shares to any trust having multiple beneficiaries or amend any trust that owns
PLR-105093-99
-4-
shares to increase the number of beneficiaries unless all such beneficiaries are persons eligible to be transferees pursuant to Section 3(a) and immediately after such transfer or amendment, the number of shareholders the Corporation is deemed to have for purposes of § 1361 would not exceed the maximum number of persons who are allowable S corporation shareholders pursuant to that section.

Notwithstanding any other provision of the shareholder agreement, the shareholders and the Corporation acknowledge and agree in Section 3(c) that none of the following shall be prohibited by the terms of this shareholder agreement: (i) the addition of a trust beneficiary due to the birth of an additional descendant of Grandparent 1; (ii) the exercise of a power of appointment granted to a beneficiary pursuant to the terms of any irrevocable trust that is in existence on the date of the agreement and that owns shares; (iii) the transfer of shares to any person in whose favor a power of appointment described in (ii) above is exercised; or (iv) the distribution of shares to (A) a beneficiary of any irrevocable trust that is in existence on the date of the agreement and that owns shares, pursuant to the terms thereof or (B) to the beneficiary of any trust created pursuant to the exercise of a power of appointment described in (ii) above, even if such addition, exercise, or distribution shall cause the termination of the Corporation’s S election.

Section 3(d) provides that prior to any transfer or other disposition of shares, if the Corporation in its discretion so requires, an opinion of counsel to the Corporation must first be received by the Corporation (the cost of which shall be borne by the shareholder whose shares are to be transferred or disposed of) that the transferee is (i) eligible to be a shareholder of an S corporation in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Code or (ii) that the transfer otherwise is allowable pursuant to the provisions of the shareholder agreement.

In addition to the other requirements of Section 3 of the shareholder agreement, Section 3(g) provides that no transfer of shares (including, without limitation, transfers pursuant to Section 3(c)) shall be permitted, and no purported transfer shall be effective, until a permitted transferee has executed a Supplemental Signature Page to the shareholder agreement. All parties agree that upon execution and acceptance of a Supplemental Signature Page, the shareholder agreement shall be amended and the transferee shall have the rights and obligations of a shareholder under the agreement.

Section 3(h) of the shareholder agreement provides that shareholders possessing 66 2/3% of the total voting power of all outstanding shares may at any time and from time to time agree in writing to authorize or ratify any transfer of shares which would
PLR-105093-99
-5-
otherwise not be permitted by the shareholder agreement, in which event the transfer shall be deemed for all purposes to comply with the shareholder agreement notwithstanding any other provision of the agreement.

Under Section 3(i), if a transfer of shares is required to be made pursuant to Section 3(c)(ii), (iii), or (iv) to a transferee who is not already a shareholder and who has not previously executed, or currently refuses to execute, a Supplemental Signature Page to the shareholder agreement (a non- consenting transferee), certain procedures will apply. The shareholders may allow the transfer of shares to the non- consenting transferee pursuant to the procedure set forth in Section 3(h). Otherwise, the shares that otherwise would be transferred to the non-consenting transferee shall instead be redeemed by the Corporation for a price equal to the fair market value of the shares as of the valuation date.

Pursuant to Section 5 of the proposed shareholder agreement, any purported transfer in violation of the shareholder agreement shall not affect the beneficial or legal ownership of shares.

Section 6 of the agreement states that subject to any limitations on dividends or other distributions imposed by statute, the Corporation shall make pro rata dividend distributions of money, based on ownership of shares, to pay the Federal, state, and local income tax on the income and gain of the Corporation (net of any tax benefits produced for the shareholders by the Corporation’s losses, deductions, and credits for the current year and for each prior year during which the Corporation’s S election was in effect) that passes through to the shareholders under the applicable provisions of the Code in respect of each taxable year (or portion thereof) of the Corporation for which its S election is in effect.

Section 7 of the proposed shareholder agreement provides that the Corporation shall (a) not issue more than one class of shares, (b) use its best efforts to avoid a termination of its S election, and (c) in the event of a termination of the S election, use its best efforts to distribute to each shareholder such shareholder’s net share of the Corporation’s undistributed taxable income for all taxable years for which the S election was in effect, to the extent permitted by law and consistent with the obligations of the Corporation to creditors, agreements to which the Corporation is a party, and other business considerations, within the period when such a distribution will be considered a non-dividend distribution under § 1371(e)(1).

Section 9 of the proposed shareholder agreement states that if the Corporation’s status as an S corporation is terminated inadvertently and the Corporation wishes to obtain a ruling under
PLR-105093-99
-6-
§ 1362(f), each shareholder agrees to make any adjustments required pursuant to § 1362(f)(4) and approved by the Corporation’s Board of Directors. A shareholder’s obligation to make such adjustments shall continue after the shareholder has ceased to own shares in the Corporation and after the shareholder agreement has terminated.

Except as directed by the shareholder agreement, the existing Trustee will continue to serve in the same manner as it previously served. In addition, Trust A will continue to be administered in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in Son’s will.
Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. Section 26.2601-1(a)(1) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations provides that the GST tax applies to any generation-skipping transfer made after October 22, 1986. Section 26.2601-1(b)(1) provides an exception to this rule for any distributions from a trust that was irrevocable on September 25, 1985. However, this exception does not apply to a pro rata portion of any generation-skipping transfer under an irrevocable trust where additions were made to the trust after September 25, 1985.

In addition, a modification to a trust that results in a change in the quality, value, or timing of any beneficial interest provided for under the trust instrument will cause the trust to lose its exempt status.
Section 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(A) provides that, except as provided under § 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B), where any portion of a trust remains in the trust after the post-September 25, 1985, release, exercise, or lapse of a power of appointment over that portion of the trust, and the release, exercise, or lapse is treated to any extent as a taxable transfer under chapter 11 or chapter 12, the value of the entire portion of the trust subject to the power that was released, exercised, or lapsed is treated as if that portion had been withdrawn and immediately retransferred to the trust at the time of the release, exercise, or lapse.

Section 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B) provides a special rule for certain powers of appointment. This section provides that the release, exercise, or lapse of a power of appointment (other than a general power of appointment as defined in § 2041(b)) will not be treated as an addition to a trust if- (1) such power of appointment was created in an irrevocable trust that is not subject to Chapter 13 under § 26.2601-1(b)(1); and (2) in the case of an exercise, such power of appointment is not exercised in a manner that may postpone or suspend the vesting, absolute ownership or power of alienation of an interest in property for a
PLR-105093-99
-7-
period, measured from the date of creation of the trust, extending beyond any life in being at the date of creation of the trust plus a period of 21 years.

Section 2041(b) provides that the term "general power of appointment" means a power that is exercisable in favor of the individual possessing the power, his estate, his creditors, or the creditors of his estate.

In this case, Trust A was created pursuant to the exercise, after September 25, 1985, of Son’s limited power of appointment. Because the exercise of Son’s limited power satisfies the requirements of § 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(B), property passing to Trust A pursuant to Son’s exercise is not considered a post- September 25, 1985, addition to the trust. Further, it is represented that there have been no additions, constructive or otherwise, to Trust A after that date. Based on the representations made and the facts submitted, we conclude that there is no change in the quality, value, or timing of any beneficial interest in Trust A resulting from the following: (i) the Trustee’s consent to Corporation’s proposed S election; (ii) the Trustee’s election to treat Trust A as an electing small business trust; and (iii) the Trustee’s execution of the proposed shareholder agreement. Therefore, items (i)-(iii) above will not cause Trust A to lose its exempt status with respect to the GST tax. Provided that there are no additions, constructive or otherwise, to Trust A after September 25, 1985, distributions from Trust A to skip persons will not be subject to the GST tax.
Except as specifically ruled herein, we express no opinion as to the consequences of this transaction under the cited provisions of the Code or under any other provisions of the Code. Specifically, we express no opinion on whether Trust A will qualify as an electing small business trust within the meaning of § 1361(e).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,
Assistant Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
By George Masnik
Chief, Branch 4

Enclosure
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace