PLR 200011039: Job transfer home did not give up a green card for tax avoidance
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A permanent resident returned with his wife to their birth country after his employer transferred him there, and he surrendered his green card. His net worth exceeded the section 877 threshold that could trigger a presumption of tax avoidance. The IRS held that his complete, good faith submission removed the presumption and established that tax avoidance was not a principal purpose of giving up resident status. The letter did not decide his U.S. tax liability before expatriation or tax consequences outside the specified expatriation provisions afterward.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Was avoiding U.S. tax a principal purpose of the green card surrender?
- Outcome: Approved: the IRS found no principal tax avoidance purpose on the submitted facts.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3); Notices 97-19 and 98-34.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Index Number: 877.01-00
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200011039
Person to Contact:
Release Date: 3/17/2000
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
PLR-114104-99/CC:INTL:B1
Date:
December 21, 1999
Re:
Tax year:
A
=
Country B =
Year C
=
Year D
=
Year E
=
Date F
=
Dear
:
This is in response to your letter dated July 8, 1999, requesting a ruling under section 877(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("Code") that A’s surrender of his U.S. Alien Registration Card (Green Card) did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
PLR-114104-99
2
A and his wife were born in Country B and they have been citizens of Country B since birth. A’s parents were also born in Country B. A moved with his wife to the United States in Year C because he was transferred by his employer to the United States. A became a permanent resident of the United States in Year D. In Year E, A was transferred by his employer back to Country B. On Date F, A voluntarily rescinded his green card (expatriated). A intends to live permanently in Country B. A is domiciled in Country B and is subject to Country B income tax on his worldwide income at a rate comparable to the applicable U.S. income tax base and rate. On the date of his expatriation, A’s net worth exceeded the amount prescribed in section 877(a)(2).
Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long-term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who "expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be subject to the special rules of section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501(a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes.
A former citizen or former long-term resident will be treated as having expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of section 877, 2107 and 2501(a)(3) if the individual’s average income tax liability or the individual’s net worth on the date of expatriation exceed certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A) and 2501(a)(3)(B).
A former U.S. citizen whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds these thresholds, however, will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen is described within certain statutory categories and submits a request for a ruling within one year of the date of loss of U.S. citizenship for the Secretary’s determination as to whether such loss had for one of it principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. See section 877(c)(1), 2107(a)(2)(B), and 2501(a)(3)(C).
Under Notice 98-34, 1998-27 I.R.B. 30, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B.
394, a former long-term resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds the applicable thresholds will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former resident is described within certain categories and submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.
Notice 97-19, as modified by Notice 98-34, requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual's expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.
PLR-114104-99
3
A is eligible to request a ruling pursuant to Notice 98-34 because he became fully liable to tax on his worldwide income in Country B, the country in which he was born.
A submitted all of the information required to be submitted by Notice 97-19, as modified by Notice 98-34.
Accordingly, based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, it is held that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 97-19, as modified by Notice 98-34. Therefore, A will not be presumed under section 877(a)(2) to have as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes. It is further held that A will not be treated under section 877(a)(1) as having as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes because the information submitted clearly established the lack of a principal purpose to avoid taxes under subtitle A or B of the Code.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to A’s U.S. tax liability for the taxable years prior to expatriation or his United States tax liability for periods after his loss of permanent resident status under sections of the Code other than sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3).
A copy of this letter must be attached to A’s U.S. income tax return for the year in which A obtained the ruling (whether or not A is otherwise required to file a return).
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to A’s representative.
Sincerely yours,
ALLEN GOLDSTEIN
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International)
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace