PLR 200005032: Former resident's departure lacked a principal tax avoidance purpose

Number
200005032
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Principal Purpose--the Avoidance of Tax
Topics
Code sections
§ 877, § 2107, § 2501
Ruling dated
November 5, 1999
Publicly released
February 4, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A former U.S. long term resident surrendered her green card after she and her husband moved back to the country where she was born. Her net worth exceeded the statutory threshold that could trigger a presumption of tax avoidance. She sought a ruling that ending her resident status did not have a principal purpose of avoiding U.S. income, estate, or gift tax. The IRS found that her submission met the requirements of the cited notices, removed the presumption, and concluded that the information clearly established no principal tax avoidance purpose under section 877. The ruling was limited to the cited expatriation provisions and did not determine her other tax liabilities.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the resident's expatriation have a principal purpose of avoiding U.S. tax?
  • Outcome: No principal tax avoidance purpose found on the submitted facts
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 877, 2107, 2501(a)(3); Notices 97-19 and 98-34

Full text (IRS public release)

200005032

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury

Index Number: 877.01-00 Washington, DC 20224

Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:

CC:INTL:Br1-PLR-108172-99
Date:

November 5, 1999

TY:
A =

Country B =
Date C =
Year 1 =
Year 2 =
Year 3 =

Date D =

Dear

This is in response to a letter dated December 15, 1997, from your authorized representative requesting a ruling under section 877(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("Code") that A's loss of long-term resident status did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

2 200005032

PLR-108172-99

A was born in Country B on Date C and is a citizen of Country B. A’s husband is employed by a Country B company. In Year 1, A’s husband was transferred by the company to the United States and A accompanied him to the United States. A and her husband obtained lawful permanent resident status thereafter. In Year 2, A’s husband was transferred to Country B. In Year 3, A and her husband decided to reside permanently in Country B. On Date D, A surrendered her green card (expatriated) at the U.S. consulate in Country B. On the date of A's expatriation, her net worth exceeded the applicable amount set forth in section 877(a)(2). A is subject to Country D tax on her worldwide income.

Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long-term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who “expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be subject to the special rules of section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss or cessation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501(a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes.

A former citizen or former long-term resident will be treated as having expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of section 877, 2107 and 2501(a)(3) if the individual’s average income tax liability or the individual's net worth on the date of expatriation exceed certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A) and 2501(a)(3)(B).

A former U.S. citizen whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds these thresholds, however, will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen is described within certain statutory categories and submits a request for a ruling within one year of the date of loss of U.S. citizenship for the Secretary's determination as to whether such loss had for one of it principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. See sections 877(c)(1), 2107(a)(2)(B), and 2501(a)(3)(C).

Under Notice 98-34, 1998-27 I.R.B. 30, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B. 394, a former long-term resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds the applicable thresholds will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former resident is described within certain categories and submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such cessation of long-term resident status had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

Notice 97-19, as modified by Notice 98-34, requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual's expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.

3 200005032

PLR-108172-99

A is eligible to request a ruling pursuant to Notice 98-34 because she became fully liable to tax on her worldwide income in Country B, the country in which she was born.

A submitted all of the information required to be submitted by Notice 97-19, as modified by Notice 98-34, including additional information requested by the Service after review of the submission.

Accordingly, based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, it is held that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 97-19, as modified by Notice 98-34. Therefore, A will not be presumed under section 877(a)(2) to have as one of her principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes. It is further held that A will not be treated under section 877(a)(1) as having as one of her principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes because the information submitted clearly establishes the lack of a principal purpose to avoid taxes under subtitle A or B of the Code.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to A's U.S. tax liability for the taxable years prior to expatriation or her U.S. tax liability for periods after her expatriation under sections of the Code other than sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3).

A copy of this letter must be attached to A's U.S. income tax return for the year in which A obtained the ruling (whether or not A is otherwise required to file a return).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

4 200005032

PLR-108172-99

Sincerely yours,

Allen Goldstein

Reviewer

Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace