PLR 200002027: Late S election accepted after shareholder and attorney misunderstood each other

Number
200002027
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Late Elections
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362
Ruling dated
October 14, 1999
Publicly released
January 14, 2000

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2000, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2000
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation's shareholder intended to elect S corporation status and asked an attorney to handle it, but a misunderstanding left Form 2553 unfiled. The corporation and shareholder nevertheless filed their federal returns as though the election had taken effect. The IRS found reasonable cause for the missed filing and agreed to treat the election as timely if the corporation filed a completed Form 2553 within 60 days of the letter. The ruling did not decide whether the corporation otherwise met the requirements for S corporation status.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the missed S corporation election be treated as timely?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to filing Form 2553 within 60 days.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1362(b)(5).

Full text (IRS public release)

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Index No.: 1362.01-03
Number: 200002027
Release Date: 1/14/2000

CC:DOM:P&SI:2 - PLR-112517-99

October 14, 1999

X =

A =

D1 =

Year 1 =

State =

Dear
:

This is in reply to your letter dated July 1, 1999, and subsequent correspondence, written on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under section 1362(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The information submitted states that X was incorporated on D1. X’s shareholder, A, intended that X elect to be an S corporation beginning with its Year 1 taxable year. A directed X’s attorney to take the necessary steps for X to be an S corporation. However, due to a misunderstanding between A and the attorney, a Form 2553, Election by a Small Business Corporation, was not filed for X. For X’s Year 1 taxable year, X and its shareholder filed their federal tax returns consistent with X being treated as an S corporation.

Section 1362(b)(5) of the Code provides that if--(A) an election under section 1362(a) is made for any taxable year after the date prescribed by section 1362(b) for making such election for such taxable year or no such election is made for any taxable year, and (B) the Secretary determines that there was reasonable cause for the failure to timely make such election, the Secretary may treat such an election as timely made for such taxable year.
Based solely on the facts and the representations submitted, we conclude that X has established reasonable cause for failing to make a timely election to be an S corporation for X's Year 1 -2-

taxable year. Accordingly, provided that X makes an election to be an S corporation by filing a completed Form 2553 with the appropriate service center effective for its Year 1 taxable year, within 60 days following the date of this letter, then such election will be treated as timely made for X’s Year 1 taxable year. A copy of this letter should be attached to the Form 2553.

Except as specifically ruled above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provisions of the Code, including whether X was or is a small business corporation under section 1361(b).

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to X.
Sincerely yours,

H. GRACE KIM
Assistant to the Chief
Branch 2
Office of the Assistant
Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and
Special Industries)

Enclosures: 2
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace