Federal Agency Decisions

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC), mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), and environmental appeals from the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board, each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

13,427 decisions and counting · Latest decision August 18, 2026
6 decisions 30 C.F.R. § 90.209(b)

No decisions match these filters

Try fewer or different words, check the spelling, or clear the filters to browse everything.

COMM

Keystone Coal Mining Corporation

Dust-citation decisions affirmed, Keystone citations vacated

This consolidated decision concerns thousands of respirable-dust sample citations issued to coal mine operators after MSHA identified abnormal white centers on dust filters. The Commission affirmed the ALJ's common-issues and Keystone decisions, holding that an abnormal white center alone did not…

November 29, 1995 ·FMSHRC
Mixed result
ALJ

Faith Coal Company

Common-issues respirable-dust decision ordered mine-specific proceedings

This release addresses common issues from a large group of MSHA citations alleging that mine operators altered respirable-dust sample filters. The ALJ found that the evidence did not prove by a preponderance that abnormal white-center patterns established intentional alteration or that deliberate…

November 23, 1992 ·James A. Broderick ·FMSHRC
Procedural
ALJ

In re: Contests of Respirable Dust Sample Alteration Citations

Reconsideration denied and discovery deadline extended

This master docket concerns citations alleging that mine operators altered the weights of respirable dust filter cassettes. The Secretary asked Judge James A. Broderick to reconsider his holding that an accidental, unintentional change in a cassette’s weight is not a violation of 30 C.F.R. §§…

September 8, 1992 ·James A. Broderick ·FMSHRC
Procedural
ALJ

In re: Contests of Respirable Dust Sample Alteration Citations

Common citation issues consolidated for trial

This master docket covered approximately 4,000 citations alleging that respirable dust filter cassettes had been altered at underground coal mines, surface facilities, and mines with special protections for miners who had evidence of pneumoconiosis. Judge James A. Broderick consolidated the cases…

August 13, 1992 ·James A. Broderick ·FMSHRC
Procedural
ALJ

Mountaineer Coal Company, Inc.

Common-issues findings lead to a mine-specific trial

This consolidated proceeding concerned roughly 5,000 citations issued to more than 800 mines for alleged intentional alteration of respirable-dust filter weights. After a common-issues trial, Judge James A. Broderick found that the Secretary's circumstantial evidence did not establish that the…

February 19, 1992 ·James A. Broderick ·FMSHRC
Procedural
ALJ

Brent Roberts

Certification revocation contest dismissed

Brent Roberts challenged a proposed revocation of his certification to collect respirable-dust samples after MSHA alleged that dust samples connected to him had not been properly collected. Judge Paul Merlin held that the certification was a property right entitled to appropriate due-process…

September 4, 1991 ·Paul Merlin ·FMSHRC
Procedural

What these documents are

  • The agencies: Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC), mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), and environmental permit and penalty appeals from the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board (EAB). Each decision page names its agency.
  • Commission and Board decisions: Rulings by the agency's highest review level (the Commission at OSHRC and FMSHRC, the Environmental Appeals Board at EPA). These are citable as precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by the agency's Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order that binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent: under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j) at OSHRC, and after the 40-day window of 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) at FMSHRC.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official public release from the deciding agency, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.