Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,593 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
5 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1926.62(g)(1)(i)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

COMM

L & L Painting Company, Inc.

Lead-monitoring exception rejected and citation items split

L & L Painting removed lead-based paint from the George Washington Bridge after employees were found to have elevated blood lead levels. The company performed no lead-exposure monitoring on the New York side and argued that monitoring from its earlier New Jersey work qualified under the…

June 28, 2012
Mixed result
ALJ

Techno Coatings

Lead-abatement citations split

Techno Coatings removed lead-based paint at a naval pier in San Diego. The judge found that the company lacked a valid initial exposure assessment because its historical data came from different bridge locations and did not reliably match the current work. OSHA's own air samples did not credibly…

April 15, 2004 ·Robert A. Yetman
Mixed result
ALJ

Lunda Construction Co.

Bridge-demolition lead violations result in $33,500 penalties

Lunda demolished a Milwaukee viaduct containing residual lead paint and relied on monitoring from a different bridge project instead of assessing the distinct cutting tasks at the new site. When employees began sizing steel on the ground, one cutter was exposed to more than 70 times the lead…

February 27, 2003 ·Robert A. Yetman
Mixed result
ALJ

Icarus Industrial Painting & Contracting Co., Inc.

Eight serious health-protection violations affirmed

Icarus removed paint and repainted an Ohio bridge using an enclosed abrasive-blasting operation. OSHA alleged numerous violations involving lead, inorganic arsenic, respirators, protective clothing, medical monitoring, and hazard communication. The judge vacated most items because air-sampling…

October 9, 2002 ·Michael H. Schoenfeld
Mixed result
ALJ

Sierra Resources, Inc.

Nine serious lead violations affirmed

Sierra Resources removed and replaced bridge bearing assemblies in Blue Island, Illinois, using torch cutting on paint that testing showed contained 50 percent lead. OSHA sampling measured one employee's exposure at 119.7 micrograms per cubic meter, more than twice the permissible limit, and…

April 15, 1999 ·Irving Sommer
Citations affirmed

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.