Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,593 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
18 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1926.550(a)(6)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

COMM

Anthony Crane Rental, Inc.

Crane inspection and repair violations affirmed

Anthony Crane Rental leased a truck crane whose boom later collapsed at an airport construction site, killing the lessee's crane oiler. On court remand, the issue was whether Anthony Crane's own employees were exposed to hazards from missing inspection records, improperly adjusted components, and…

March 3, 1997
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Ralph Taynton d/b/a Service Specialty

EAJA fee request denied despite prevailing

Service Specialty sought $34,512.95 in attorney, agent, and other expenses after the Commission vacated its citation in full. The Commission had held that OSHA lacked jurisdiction because the sole proprietorship had stopped operating and no longer had an employee before the citation issued. The fee…

October 15, 1996 ·Nancy J. Spies
Procedural
COMM

Anthony Crane Rental, Inc.

Crane inspection and maintenance violations affirmed after court remand

Anthony Crane Rental leased a crane whose boom later collapsed at an airport construction project, killing another contractor's employee. After a court remand, the issue was whether Anthony Crane Rental's own employees had been exposed to the conditions involving missing annual-inspection records…

November 15, 1994
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Irwin Steel Erectors Inc.

Four contested construction items vacated

Irwin Steel Erectors performed steel erection and welding during construction of a Motorola facility in Austin, Texas. At the hearing, it resolved six serious citation items by withdrawing its contests in exchange for reduced penalties. The four remaining items concerned fire-extinguisher access…

August 30, 1993 ·E. Carter Botkin
Mixed result
ALJ

Vogel Brothers

Four serious construction violations affirmed, two vacated

Vogel Brothers Building Company was the general contractor on a wastewater administration building project in Tampa, Florida. The judge affirmed serious violations involving an unavailable fire extinguisher at a diesel fueling area, unguarded floor edges, an unbarricaded crane swing radius, and…

March 12, 1993 ·James D. Burroughs
Mixed result
COMM

Daniel International Corp.

Pre-Barlow's inspection evidence remained admissible

OSHA inspected Daniel International's Missouri power-plant construction project in 1977 without a warrant, before the Supreme Court's 1978 decision in Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc. Daniel sought to suppress the inspection evidence, arguing that its project manager had not voluntarily consented and had…

March 26, 1980
Mixed result
COMM

Derr Construction Company

Safety-belt citation affirmed, five other steel-erection items vacated

Derr Construction was erecting a high-rise steel frame when an ironworker worked on the top edge of a girder on the 13th floor without using an available safety belt. The Commission upheld the serious personal protective equipment violation because the worker faced an obvious fall hazard and the…

April 26, 1977
Mixed result
COMM

O.K. Construction Company, Inc.

Crane, hard-hat, and recordkeeping items affirmed with penalties reduced

O.K. Construction was performing excavation work with a crawler crane at a West Virginia lift-station project. The judge affirmed a repeated fire-extinguisher violation and nonserious items involving missing crane information, an unbarricaded swing radius, absent annual-inspection records, an…

April 19, 1977
Modified
COMM

K M Engineering Company

Sideboom rope, records, and worn-shackle violations affirmed

K M Engineering used knots to connect wire ropes on two sideboom tractors, maintained inadequate annual inspection records, and continued using an excessively worn boom-block shackle. The judge affirmed the knotted-rope item without penalty because knots weakened the ropes and exposed workers…

April 18, 1977
Citations affirmed
COMM

Union Steel Erectors, Inc.

Willful crane-riding and fall violations affirmed

OSHA observed Union Steel employees riding a crane hook, headache ball, and suspended steel loads 50 to 70 feet above the ground. The foreman knowingly allowed the practice for about a week, the general contractor had warned him it violated safety rules, and the crane operator knew it was…

January 6, 1977
Citations affirmed
COMM

CTM, Inc.

Combined trench and spoil-pile violation affirmed

CTM excavated a 13-foot-deep sewer trench in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, without shoring and with nearly vertical lower walls in soil of average stability. A ten-foot-high spoil pile containing large soil chunks sat three feet from the trench, where employees were working below. The Commission held…

July 21, 1976
Citations affirmed
COMM

Martin Iron Works, Inc.

Crane inspection violations added without penalties

Martin Iron Works used a crane beyond the manufacturer's rated lifting radius and capacity during structural steel erection at a Nevada casino project. The judge affirmed that serious violation for $850, along with an inadequate ladder for $55, unsecured gas cylinders for $55, and an improperly…

January 17, 1975
Mixed result
COMM

White Oak Corporation

Crane power-line violations affirmed with $1,355 penalties

White Oak operated a crane near 13,200-volt power lines at a Connecticut highway project. The crane boom and ball contacted the lines, and an oiler at the outrigger controls was electrocuted. The judge found a serious violation for failing to maintain ten feet of clearance and a nonserious…

August 6, 1974
Citations affirmed
COMM

Ed Miller and Sons, Inc.

Demolition-crane penalties reduced to $265

Ed Miller and Sons used a 3,000-pound wrecking ball suspended from a crane loadline by a used truck tire while demolishing Omaha's Union Station. The Commission found a serious violation because the tire was not a positive attachment and the ball could become accidentally disconnected, assessing…

July 31, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

Ron M. Fiegen, Inc.

Safety-net citation vacated and crane items affirmed

Ron M. Fiegen performed structural-steel work at a university construction site where an OSHA inspector observed employees on a temporary roof and suspended scaffold. The Commission upheld the inspection because the inspector had presented credentials to the general contractor, viewed the…

July 8, 1974
Mixed result
COMM

Harvey Wrecking Co.

Demolition-sequence item vacated

Harvey Wrecking was demolishing a 14-story Chicago building where an employee worked beside an unguarded wall opening and equipment operated near floor openings without curbs or stoplogs. The Commission affirmed those two conditions as serious violations of specific standards under section 5(a)(2)…

November 12, 1973
Mixed result
COMM

The Verne-Woodrow Company

Access citation affirmed and safety-net item vacated

Verne-Woodrow employees erected steel framing and installed roof-truss bracing about 28 feet above ground and over a concrete pit. They used no safety nets, scaffolds, catch platforms, temporary floors, safety lines, or safety belts. The administrative law judge nevertheless vacated the safety-net…

July 13, 1973
Mixed result
COMM

Atlantic Concrete, Inc.

Mixed ruling on floor opening and crane citations

Atlantic Concrete was cited for an unguarded floor opening and several recordkeeping, posting, first-aid, and crane-related conditions. The parties stipulated that several non-serious items were unsupported, inapplicable, or abandoned. The judge vacated those items, affirmed two crane violations…

November 16, 1972
Mixed result

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.