Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,593 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
7 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1926.451(a)(1)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

ALJ

Pro-Spec Corporation dba Pro-Spec Painting

Two worksite citation sets affirmed

Pro-Spec performed abrasive blasting and painting at water-tank projects in Easton and Quakertown, Pennsylvania. OSHA cited respiratory-protection, scaffold, fall-protection, ladder, electrical-wiring, confined-space, and recordkeeping violations after a suspended scaffold collapsed at the Easton…

September 21, 2018 ·Covette Rooney
Citations affirmed
ALJ

A.C. Castle Construction Co., Inc. / Daryl J. Provencher, d/b/a Provencher Home Improvement

Roofing violations yield $173,500 in penalties

A.C. Castle Construction contracted with homeowners for roofing work and assigned projects to Provencher Home Improvement. At a Massachusetts house, at least two roofers fell about 20 feet after a wooden scaffold plank snapped, and OSHA cited scaffold, ladder, training, anchorage, and fall…

April 17, 2017 ·Sharon D. Calhoun
Mixed result
ALJ

Absolute Roofing & Construction, Inc.

Four scaffold and fall-protection items affirmed

Absolute Roofing's worker repaired a steep church roof without fall protection above a scaffold that lacked base plates and guardrails. The judge treated Absolute Roofing and Absolute Exteriors as a single employer because they shared ownership, management, an office, employees, work, and their…

September 23, 2013 ·Carol A. Baumerich
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Mast Climber Manufacturing, Inc., d/b/a American Mast Climbers

Scaffold items split, design violation willful

Mast Climber Manufacturing erected and serviced a mast-climbing work platform on a 21-story construction project. Four contractor employees fell when one side of the platform collapsed, and three died. The judge held that the system was a scaffold, not an aerial lift, because it was not…

March 8, 2013 ·Ken S. Welsch
Mixed result
ALJ

Malu Construction Co., and its successors

Jury-rigged scaffold items affirmed for $8,000

Malu called its framing workers independent subcontractors, but it supplied their scaffold and safety equipment, assigned their work, provided training, and retained authority to stop work. Judge Stanley M. Schwartz therefore treated them as Malu employees under the common-law control test. OSHA…

September 17, 1999 ·Stanley M. Schwartz
Mixed result
COMM

Northwestern Insulation Co., Inc.

Scaffold violations and walkaround inspection affirmed

Northwestern Insulation employees worked from multilevel scaffolding while covering heat-exchanger towers on a roof about 30 feet above the ground. The judge affirmed violations involving missing guardrails and toeboards, excessive plank spans, and excessive plank overhang, with total penalties of…

March 15, 1977
Citations affirmed
COMM

Beall Construction Co.

Construction penalties reduced to $620

Beall Construction was the general contractor on a 12-story building project and faced serious, other-than-serious, and failure-to-abate allegations with proposed penalties totaling $35,442. The Commission adopted the judge's mixed disposition of the citations, including a serious violation for a…

February 21, 1974
Modified

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.