Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,593 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
12 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1926.401(a)(1)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

COMM

Chapman Construction Co., Inc.

Repeated grounding and serious fall violations affirmed

A portable circular saw previously cited for lack of grounding again failed a continuity test, and employees used stairways and landings with missing or inadequate rails. The Commission held that inexpensive continuity testing would have revealed the saw's latent grounding defect through reasonable…

December 17, 1980
Mixed result
COMM

Masonry Contractors, Inc.

Fall-protection items affirmed and saw-grounding item vacated

Masonry Contractors employees worked on the seventh floor near unguarded shafts, floor holes, open sides, and a material-hoist landing. The subcontractor did not inspect the floor, warn its employees, request correction by the general contractor, or use realistic alternative protection, and it…

March 31, 1980
Mixed result
COMM

George Hyman Construction Company

Six repeated classifications stand after a divided Commission

George Hyman admitted six construction violations involving material storage, electrical grounding, temporary-light guards, ladder clearance, floor-edge guarding, and crane operation. Each standard had been cited previously at another nearby Hyman worksite, and those earlier citations had become…

April 26, 1977
Citations affirmed
COMM

Walker Construction Company

Late notice of contest dismissed

OSHA cited Walker Construction for ungrounded portable tools and uncovered or unbarricaded pier holes, proposing $85 in total penalties. Walker's vice president signed a notice of contest before the deadline, but a secretary did not mail it until five days after the statutory filing period expired…

April 11, 1977
Procedural
COMM

Howard P. Foley Co.

Injury-log item affirmed and four worksite items vacated

Howard P. Foley performed electrical work at a power-plant construction site. The judge affirmed a recordkeeping item because the onsite injury and illness log contained no entry for a known lost-time injury, and he assessed a $50 penalty. He vacated a housekeeping item because valves awaiting…

March 11, 1977
Mixed result
COMM

Consolidated Interior Systems, Inc.

Six site-safety items affirmed with reduced penalties

Consolidated Interior Systems was a drywall subcontractor at a New Jersey shopping-center project. Employees used ungrounded power tools and defective extension cords, worked around unguarded temporary bulbs and debris, and used a narrow mobile scaffold without guardrails or caster locks. The judge…

January 26, 1977
Modified
COMM

Crain Electric, Inc.

Eight construction items vacated for lack of exposure proof

Crain Electric was an electrical subcontractor on a large power-station construction project with many other contractors. OSHA cited temporary wiring conditions, floor openings, floor holes, and unguarded elevated floors and proposed penalties totaling $145. The compliance officer did not observe…

October 20, 1976
Citations vacated
COMM

Harold Christiansen and Harold W. Christiansen, d/b/a Palmer Christiansen Company

Ungrounded power-tool violation affirmed

Palmer Christiansen performed sheet-metal work at a Salt Lake City construction site. OSHA found a portable electric drill and chipping hammer in the company's gang box with their grounding prongs broken or cut off. The tools were available for employees to use in installing ductwork, although the…

March 18, 1976
Citations affirmed
COMM

Danco construction Company

Mixed ruling on sewer-work citations and penalties

Danco received consolidated citations from three Little Rock sewer-construction sites involving posting, hard hats, fire protection, fuel handling, trenching, electrical equipment, ladders, traffic visibility, and spoil placement. The Commission held that Danco's timely contest of a citation also…

April 22, 1975
Mixed result
COMM

Kingery Construction Company

Forklift-platform hazard charge vacated, other items affirmed

Kingery used a platform attached to forklift forks to place an employee about eighteen feet above the ground for concrete-chipping work. OSHA alleged a serious general-duty violation because the forklift was unattended and the employee had no platform controls. The Commission affirmed vacation of…

April 11, 1975
Mixed result
COMM

Everhart Steel Construction Company, Inc.

Roof-edge and grounding citations affirmed

An Everhart Steel employee worked at the edge of a flat roof thirty-two feet above the ground, leaning over the side to pass siding and other material to workers on a scaffold. The roof had no perimeter guard or other protective device. The Commission held that the open-sided-floor standard applied…

April 9, 1975
Citations affirmed
COMM

Advance Air Conditioning, Inc.

Roof-opening violation affirmed under specific standard

Advance Air Conditioning was installing ductwork at the Las Vegas Convention Center while employees worked on a roof with unguarded openings 48 to 51 feet above ground. One employee fell through a 2-by-30-foot opening located within inches of his work area after the opening had remained unguarded…

April 4, 1974
Mixed result

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.