Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,593 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
5 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1918.43(e)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

COMM

Universal Terminal & Transport, a Division of Universal Maritime Service Corp.

Unsecured hatch-beam citation affirmed

Universal Terminal & Transport conducted longshoring work at the Port of New York beneath a one-ton hatch beam whose locking devices were broken. The company tied the beam with manila rope, but a crane cable snagged it and pulled it from its sockets, causing it to fall into the hatch and inflict…

September 9, 1976
Citations affirmed
COMM

Northeast Stevedoring Co., Inc.

Unsecured-pontoon violations affirmed

Northeast Stevedoring Co., Inc. loaded and unloaded cargo aboard the S/S Hermes and S/S Socrates at a Brooklyn pier. OSHA cited the company for serious violations involving hatch pontoons that were not secured against accidental displacement while employees worked cargo nearby. The judge found that…

November 6, 1974
Citations affirmed
COMM

California Stevedore and Ballast Company

Two longshoring citations affirmed

California Stevedore employees worked cargo aboard two vessels under an unsecured 1,000-pound hatch beam, with open-ended hatch-beam hooks, and on narrow ledges without handlines or grab rails. The Commission amended the unsecured-beam citation to allege a serious violation, affirmed it, and…

September 4, 1973
Mixed result
COMM

Portland Stevedoring Company

Unsecured hatch-beam violation classified as serious

Portland Stevedoring employees unloaded cargo from a ship while an unsecured hatch beam remained above the working hold. The beam was about 30 feet long, weighed 900 to 1,200 pounds, and was positioned roughly 40 feet above at least three employees. The Commission held the violation serious because…

July 25, 1973
Modified
COMM

Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.

Serious hatch-pontoon violation affirmed

Crescent Wharf & Warehouse employees loaded flour into a ship's hold through a deck hatch in Seattle. Two metal hatch pontoons weighing about two tons each were left unsecured above roughly ten employees working 30 feet below, and the company's walking boss knew of the condition for at least two…

April 27, 1973
Citations affirmed

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.