Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,593 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
7 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1910.333(b)(2)(i)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

ALJ

Jersey City Medical Center

Electrical-safety and willful training violations affirmed

A Jersey City Medical Center maintenance mechanic received an electric shock while working on a 277-volt light fixture, fell from a ladder, and later died from his injuries. OSHA cited the hospital for failing to deenergize live parts, use electrical lockout/tagout procedures, maintain compliant…

August 2, 2019 ·Covette Rooney
Citations affirmed
ALJ

GEM, Inc.

Electrical PPE and insulated-equipment items affirmed after an arc blast

GEM repaired an electrical power system at a county courthouse after lightning damage, and an arc blast occurred while its crew performed a polarity test on energized equipment. The judge found that replacing the damaged bus section was maintenance rather than construction, so the general industry…

July 29, 2009 ·Nancy J. Spies
Mixed result
ALJ

St. Lawrence Food Corp., dba Primo Foods

Most dairy-plant health and safety citations affirmed

OSHA conducted health and safety inspections at Primo Foods, a kosher dairy, and cited hazards involving ammonia refrigeration, respirators, confined spaces, chemical training, noise, machine guarding, electrical work, lockout/tagout, powered industrial trucks, and recordkeeping. The ALJ found that…

October 15, 2007 ·G. Marvin Bober
Mixed result
ALJ

General Cutlery Co., Inc.

Knife maker loses on almost every safety and health citation, including a willful hazard-communication violation

General Cutlery makes bayonets and household knives in Fremont, Ohio. After complaint inspections in May 1994, OSHA issued two sets of citations, later consolidated: safety violations (Docket No. 94-2015) and health violations (Docket No. 94-1933). The company, represented by its president, argued…

November 27, 1995 ·Paul L. Brady
Mixed result
ALJ

Amalgamated Sugar Company

Beet receiving station held subject to general-industry standards

Amalgamated Sugar Company operated an Idaho station that received sugar beets from private growers after harvest, then cleaned, conveyed, and stored them for sugar production. The company argued that its station was an agricultural operation exempt from the cited general-industry rules…

May 15, 1995 ·Benjamin R. Loye
Citations affirmed
ALJ

McCain Foods, Inc.

Willful asbestos violations and $165,000 in penalties affirmed

McCain Foods operated a food-processing plant in Easton, Maine, while a major renovation project removed old piping and other material containing asbestos. The judge found that management knew asbestos was present, misled an OSHA inspector about the work, failed to train or protect employees, and…

June 3, 1994 ·Barbara L. Hassenfeld-Rutberg
Mixed result
ALJ

Homestead Gourmet Food Co., Inc.

Settlement approved after hearing

OSHA inspected Homestead Gourmet Food Company's facility in Linden, New Jersey, and issued two citations. The citations alleged six serious violations and five other-than-serious violations under standards addressing exits, personal protective equipment, emergency washing, electrical training…

February 11, 1994 ·Irving Sommer
Settled

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.