Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,593 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
4 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1910.119(e)(5)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

COMM

BP Products North America, Inc., and BP-Husky Refining, LLC

Most refinery PSM items vacated

OSHA alleged 65 willful process safety management violations at BP’s Ohio refinery and proposed $2.87 million in penalties. Fifty-six items concerning pressure-relief equipment, cross-connections, and facility siting reached the Commission. The Commission vacated the pressure-relief items because…

September 27, 2018
Mixed result
COMM

Delek Refining, Ltd.

Four refinery safety items affirmed and two vacated

OSHA cited six conditions at Delek's Texas oil refinery under the process safety management, machine guarding, and hazard communication standards. The Commission affirmed PSM items for failing to resolve process-hazard-analysis and audit findings inherited from the prior owner, holding that the…

April 23, 2015
Mixed result
ALJ

Randalls Food and Drugs, Inc.

Ammonia process-safety violations split

Randalls Food and Drugs operated a Houston food warehouse with an anhydrous-ammonia refrigeration system. The judge affirmed a process-safety violation because Randalls did not timely complete, document, and communicate actions responding to its process-hazard analysis. He also affirmed…

December 8, 2003 ·Robert A. Yetman
Mixed result
ALJ

Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc.

Emergency-action and lockout violations yield $12,000

OSHA inspected Akzo Nobel Chemicals' organic peroxide plant and initially proposed $240,000 for serious, willful, repeat, and other-than-serious violations. The Secretary withdrew most items, and Judge Robert A. Yetman vacated several remaining allegations for insufficient proof. Akzo intended…

November 13, 1998 ·Robert A. Yetman
Mixed result

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.