Federal agency decisions, searchable in plain English.

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC) and mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

5,593 decisions and counting · Latest decision July 17, 2026
12 decisions 29 C.F.R. § 1910.107(c)(6)

No decisions match these filters

Try a different search term or clear the filters.

ALJ

Dierzen-Kewanee Heavy Industries, LTD

Unabated hazards resulted in $133,100 in penalties

Dierzen-Kewanee manufactured dump-truck bodies at a former boiler factory in Illinois. After settling earlier OSHA citations, the company paid only the first penalty installment, did not provide requested abatement information, and left many cited conditions uncorrected for a follow-up inspection…

March 26, 2009 ·Nancy J. Spies
Modified
COMM

Oberdorfer Industries, Inc.

Foundry citations partly affirmed and partly vacated

Oberdorfer operated an aluminum foundry that OSHA inspected under a local emphasis program for primary-metal industries. The Commission vacated the no-smoking-sign and explosion-proof-wiring items because the Secretary did not perform the testing her expert said was needed to establish dangerous…

August 29, 2003
Mixed result
ALJ

Louis A. Dierzen d/b/a Dierzen Welding & Machine Company, Dierzen Machine Company, and Dierzen Trailer Corporation

Failure-to-abate and repeat spray-area violations affirmed by default

Dierzen ran a welding and machine shop in Newark, Illinois with about 12 employees. In March 1997, OSHA conducted a follow-up inspection to check whether earlier, uncontested violations had been fixed. The inspector found that explosion-proof electrical equipment for the paint spray area had been…

March 9, 1998 ·Stanley M. Schwartz
Citations affirmed
ALJ

Beall Construction, Inc., d/b/a Tiger Manufacturing

Settlement resolves two consolidated cases, $1,000 penalty

Beall Construction, Inc., doing business as Tiger Manufacturing in Dallas, Texas, faced OSHA citations in two separate cases covering welding, respirator, flammable-liquid, spray-finishing, and electrical safety standards. At a June 28, 1994 hearing, the parties used a short settlement discussion…

September 9, 1994 ·Stanley M. Schwartz
Settled
COMM

The Specialist of the South, Inc.

$3,000 penalty affirmed for 39 serious items

The Specialists operated a small furniture repair, refinishing, and upholstery business using flammable and toxic materials. OSHA cited 39 serious violations, primarily involving fire and explosion hazards, and proposed $9,900 in penalties. An ALJ affirmed every serious item but assessed a combined…

November 7, 1990
Citations affirmed
COMM

Mikel Company, Inc.

Grounding item settled for $1 after mixed plant ruling

Mikel Company manufactured furniture at a Bronx plant where OSHA cited flammable-liquid storage, spray-finishing, hazard communication, posting, and injury-recordkeeping conditions. The ALJ affirmed several storage-room and spray-booth ventilation items with $375 in penalties, vacated several…

June 6, 1989
Settled
COMM

Harrison Furniture Manufacturing Company

Commission approves withdrawal of all citations

OSHA cited Harrison Furniture Manufacturing Company for numerous conditions at its Arkansas furniture plant after an inspection conducted under a warrant. The earlier litigation addressed whether evidence from a plant-wide inspection should be suppressed when the warrant application was based on…

March 20, 1987
Settled
COMM

Air-Kare Corporation

Aircraft spray-room violations affirmed

Air-Kare spray-painted aircraft in a curtained section of a hangar near non-explosion-proof electrical equipment and beneath a ceiling with exposed wood framing. The Commission credited the compliance officer's observations and opinion that dangerous quantities of flammable vapors were present near…

October 30, 1981
Citations affirmed
COMM

Clifford B. Hannay & Son, Inc.

Spray-booth electrical violation reduced to de minimis

Hannay manufactured industrial hose reels and used flammable lacquer and solvents in spray booths. Electrical switches and receptacles that were not approved for a Class I, Division 2 hazardous area were located more than five feet but less than twenty feet from the booth openings, contrary to 29…

February 1, 1978
Modified
COMM

Midwest Steel Fabricators, Inc.

Abatement-extension petition denied

Midwest Steel Fabricators sought more time to abate two violations. The judge denied the petition after finding that the company remained out of compliance, had not proved a good-faith abatement effort, and had not shown that factors beyond its reasonable control prevented completion. The company…

October 31, 1977
Procedural
COMM

Keystone Body Works

Paint-room citations affirmed in part

Keystone Body Works operated an automobile repair and spray-painting shop in Lubbock, Texas. OSHA alleged several combined fire and health hazards in the paint room, including inadequate ventilation, spraying near a heater, non-explosion-proof lighting, excess stored paint, and failure to use an…

August 3, 1976
Mixed result
COMM

Colonial Craft Reproductions, Inc.

Seven items affirmed but all penalties vacated

Colonial Craft, a very small wooden-giftware manufacturer, was cited for nine non-serious violations, with $165 in penalties proposed for spray-area electrical wiring, exit signs, machine belts, and radial saws. The Commission agreed that the penalized conditions were not minor and ordinarily would…

October 27, 1972
Mixed result

What these documents are

  • Commission decisions: Rulings by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission itself, the highest level of agency review. These are citable as Commission precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by OSHRC Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j): it binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent in other cases.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official OSHRC public release, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.