Federal Agency Decisions

Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC), mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), and environmental appeals from the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board, each with a plain-English summary, the standards it cites, and whether it counts as precedent. More agencies are coming.

16,281 decisions and counting · Latest decision September 10, 2026
16,281 decisions

No decisions match these filters

Try fewer or different words, check the spelling, or clear the filters to browse everything.

COMM

J.W. Delahoussaye & Sons, Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving J.W. Delahoussaye & Sons, Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission to…

May 24, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Litton Systems, Inc., Ingalls Shipbuilding Division

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Litton Systems, Inc., Ingalls Shipbuilding Division. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or…

May 24, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

W.H. Allgood and Company

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving W.H. Allgood and Company. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission to change…

May 24, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Dravo Corp.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Dravo Corporation. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, the Commission brought it up for review on its own motion. Neither party objected to the judge's decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it. Because no party…

May 24, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Rupert Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Rupert Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, the Commission brought it up for review on its own motion. Neither party objected to the judge's decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it…

May 24, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Sunbell Corporation

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Sunbell Corporation. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, the Commission brought it up for review on its own motion. Neither party objected to the judge's decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it. Because no party…

May 24, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Ve-Alite Plastic Corp.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Ve-Alite Plastic Corp. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, the Commission brought it up for review on its own motion. Neither party objected to the judge's decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it. Because no party…

May 24, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

R. Colwill Excavating, Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving R. Colwill Excavating, Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, the Commission brought it up for review on its own motion. Neither party objected to the judge's decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it. Because no…

May 24, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Capitol Temptrol Corp.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Capitol Temptrol Corp. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, the Commission brought it up for review on its own motion. Neither party objected to the judge's decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it. Because no party…

May 23, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Armor Shield, Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Armor Shield, Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, the Commission brought it up for review on its own motion. Neither party objected to the judge's decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it. Because no party…

May 23, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

United States Sugar Corp.

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order involving United States Sugar Corp. The Commission called the case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected to the judge's ruling or otherwise expressed dissatisfaction with it. The Commission found no…

May 23, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Frontier Roofing Co., Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Frontier Roofing Company, Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, the Commission brought it up for review on its own motion. Neither party objected to the judge's decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it. Because…

May 23, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

C. L. Cook, Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving C. L. Cook, Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, the Commission brought it up for review on its own motion. Neither party objected to the judge's decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it. Because no party…

May 23, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order involving Westinghouse Electric Corp. The Commission called the case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected to that decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it. Because the review order…

May 23, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Howard P. Foley Co.

Commission finds the electrical violations unpreventable

Howard P. Foley Co. employed electricians at a building construction project where a journeyman was electrocuted while installing a 277-volt exit light. A wiring error left the circuit energized even though the circuit breaker shown on the diagram was disconnected, and the employee did not use his…

May 23, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations vacated
COMM

Braswell Motor Freight Lines, Inc.

Commission distinguishes recurring violations from failure to abate

Braswell Motor Freight Lines operated a freight terminal that OSHA reinspected after several uncontested citations became final orders. The Commission affirmed a failure to abate the missing stair handrail but assessed no penalty because the company made substantial good-faith efforts and the…

May 19, 1977 ·OSHRC
Mixed result
COMM

Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order involving Greyhound Lines, Inc. The Commission called the case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected or otherwise asked the Commission to change the ruling. Because the review order identified no…

May 19, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Lembke Construction Co., Inc.

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order involving Lembke Construction Co., Inc. The Commission called the case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected to the decision or otherwise asked the Commission to change it. Because the review order…

May 19, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Gamblin Electric Co.

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order involving Gamblin Electric Co. The Commission called the case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected to the decision or asked the Commission to change it. The Commission found no compelling public…

May 19, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

M.C.L., Inc.

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order involving M.C.L., Inc. The Commission called the case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected or otherwise asked the Commission to change the ruling. The Commission found no compelling public interest…

May 19, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Great Falls Tribune Company

Proposed pressroom noise controls were not economically feasible

The Great Falls Tribune operated newspaper presses that exposed pressroom employees to average noise near 100 dBA during runs averaging about three and one-half hours. The company required earmuffs that reduced exposure by at least 20 dBA when worn properly. Engineering controls modeled on another…

May 19, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations vacated
COMM

Miller Valentine Corporation

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order covering two dockets involving Miller Valentine Corporation. The Commission called the consolidated case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected or otherwise asked the Commission to change the ruling…

May 19, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

General Electric Company, Inc.

Commission affirms two violations and vacates two others

OSHA cited General Electric after inspecting its Schenectady, New York, worksite. The Commission vacated a machine-guarding citation because guards and a spacer protected the radiac cutoff machine's point of operation, and it also left an electrical citation vacated. It affirmed a general duty…

May 19, 1977 ·OSHRC
Mixed result
COMM

Castle & Cooke Foods, a Division of Castle & Cooke, Inc.

Commission finds proposed noise controls economically infeasible

Castle & Cooke Foods operated a Hawaiian can plant and cannery where employees worked around machines producing noise above the limits in OSHA's noise standard. The company provided mandatory hearing protection, while the proposed engineering controls would require custom machine enclosures and a…

May 19, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations vacated
COMM

Glass Menagerie Company

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Glass Menagerie Company. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission to change…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Serge Elevator Company, Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Serge Elevator Company, Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission to…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

American Window Cleaning Company

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving American Window Cleaning Company. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Invirex Demolition, Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Invirex Demolition, Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission to change…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Blake Construction Co., Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Blake Construction Co., Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission to…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Miller and Long Company of Maryland, Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Miller and Long Company of Maryland, Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Federal Steel Corporation

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Federal Steel Corporation. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission to…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Building Specialties, Inc.

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order involving Building Specialties, Inc. The Commission called the case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected or otherwise asked the Commission to change the ruling. Because the review order identified…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Bethlehem Steel Corporation

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order involving Bethlehem Steel Corporation. The Commission called the case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected or otherwise asked the Commission to change the ruling. Because the review order identified…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

The Israel Realty Corp.

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order involving The Israel Realty Corp. The Commission called the case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected or otherwise asked the Commission to change the ruling. Because the review order identified no…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Oscar J. Boldt Construction Co.

Commission lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order involving Oscar J. Boldt Construction Co. The Commission called the case for review on its own motion after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision. Neither party objected or otherwise asked the Commission to change the ruling. Because the review order…

May 18, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Cornell & Co., Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Cornell & Co., Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission to change the…

May 17, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Consolidated Freightways Corporation

OSHA applies to unguarded truck maintenance pits

Consolidated Freightways operated a truck terminal maintenance shop with seven service pits and about 300 employees. The company argued that federal motor-carrier regulation displaced OSHA jurisdiction, but the Commission found no other federal regulation governing maintenance-shop safety and held…

May 17, 1977 ·OSHRC
Modified
COMM

Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company

Commission permits withdrawal of a telephone-manhole citation

OSHA cited Southern Bell for not keeping an employee nearby to render emergency assistance while another employee worked in a telephone manhole. The Secretary later sought dismissal because the cited construction standard governed electric power transmission and distribution, not telecommunications…

May 16, 1977 ·OSHRC
Procedural
COMM

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.

Noise citation fails without proof that specific controls were feasible

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel employees at an Ohio mill were exposed to noise above OSHA's permissible levels in five work areas. OSHA's industrial hygienist described general noise-reduction methods for four areas but lacked noise-control expertise, gave no expected reduction levels, and offered no…

May 13, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations vacated
COMM

Willamette Iron and Steel Company

Shipboard housekeeping violation was not preventable

Willamette Iron and Steel was repairing a Navy vessel while about 400 Navy personnel performed similar work aboard the ship. Tools, hoses, and electrical leads repeatedly obstructed walkways, but the judge found that Navy personnel created the conditions and that the company complained to the Navy…

May 13, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations vacated
COMM

Dayton Metal Products, Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Dayton Metal Products, Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission to…

May 12, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Howrey Lumber Company, Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Howrey Lumber Company, Inc. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or asked the Commission to…

May 12, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp., Wheeling Corrugating Company, Division of Wheeling-Pittsburgh Corporation

Older-crane guarding citations are vacated

These consolidated cases involved electrical and moving-part guarding requirements for overhead and gantry cranes. The Commission held that the cited requirements were design specifications that were mandatory for cranes installed on or after August 31, 1971, but advisory for older cranes. Because…

May 12, 1977 ·OSHRC
Mixed result
COMM

Thomco, Inc.

Commission declines review and affirms the ALJ decision

This is a short procedural order in the consolidated cases of Thomco, Inc. (Docket Nos. 76-1498 and 76-1402). The case came to the Commission on its own (sua sponte) order for review, but neither party filed objections, a petition for discretionary review, or any expression of dissatisfaction with…

May 11, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Colfry Brothers Terrazzo Contractors, Inc.

Commission declines review and affirms the ALJ decision

This is a short procedural order in a case involving Colfry Brothers Terrazzo Contractors, Inc. The case came to the Commission on its own (sua sponte) order for review, but neither party filed objections, a petition for discretionary review, or any expression of dissatisfaction with the…

May 11, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Tom Stewart Construction Co., Inc.

Commission declines review and lets the judge's decision stand

This is a short Commission order in a case involving Tom Stewart Construction Co., a construction employer. After an Administrative Law Judge ruled on the case, a Commissioner brought it up for review on the Commission's own motion (a sua sponte order for review). Neither side filed objections or…

May 11, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

Otis Elevator Company

Elevator-car top was not a floor or platform requiring guardrails

Two Otis Elevator employees stood on top of an elevator car while painting counterweight rails during installation. OSHA alleged a repeated violation because the car top lacked a standard railing. The Commission held that the surface was the roof of the elevator car, not an open-sided floor or a…

May 11, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations vacated
COMM

M. K. Binkley Construction Company

OSHA did not prove a feasible roof fall-protection method

M. K. Binkley Construction employees installed roof decking near an edge with a possible fall of 15 to 20 feet and wore no fall-protection equipment. OSHA proposed safety belts and lanyards connected to lifelines attached to the walls or to a new frame around the roof perimeter. The Commission held…

May 11, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations vacated
COMM

Paramount Plumbing & Heating Co.

Two shared-site hazards affirmed, open-floor item vacated

Paramount Plumbing worked as a subcontractor on a New York City high-rise project. The Commission vacated an open-floor guardrail item because OSHA did not prove that Paramount's employees would enter the fall-hazard zones on the seventh or twenty-ninth floors. It affirmed items involving ladder…

May 11, 1977 ·OSHRC
Mixed result
COMM

Clarence Brown, d/b/a Brown's Contracting

First-aid item vacated, ladder and scaffold violations stand

Brown's Contracting was reroofing and residing a residential building when OSHA cited first-aid, ladder, and scaffold conditions. The Commission reviewed the first-aid item and held that OSHA did not prove supplies were unavailable because an employee said bandages were generally kept in the trucks…

May 10, 1977 ·OSHRC
Mixed result
COMM

Westburne Drilling, Inc.

Two items vacated and one left de minimis

Three items from a nonserious citation against Westburne Drilling were before the Administrative Law Judge. The judge vacated items 1 and 2 and classified item 8 as de minimis with no penalty. The employer sought vacation of all three items, while the Secretary did not object to the judge's…

May 10, 1977 ·OSHRC
Mixed result
COMM

B. F. Goodrich Textile Products, a Division of The B. F. Goodrich Co.

Employer knowledge supplied adequate notice of machine violations

B. F. Goodrich manufactured tire cord and related products at a large Georgia textile plant. OSHA cited unguarded card-machine pulleys, unguarded loom sprockets and chains, fire extinguishers mounted too high, and missing signed crane-inspection reports without identifying every machine or…

May 10, 1977 ·OSHRC
Mixed result
COMM

I.T.O. Corporation of New England; John T. Clark & Son of Boston, Inc.; Terminal Services, Inc.

Withdrawn contests reinstate citations

An Administrative Law Judge had vacated citations against three employers in five consolidated dockets. After that decision, the employers asked to withdraw their notices of contest and terminate the proceedings. The Commission granted the request because it served the purposes of the OSH Act. It…

May 10, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed
COMM

GAF Corporation

Two items affirmed under precedent, one dismissed

An Administrative Law Judge affirmed three citation items against GAF Corporation under subsections of the cited standard. On review, both parties agreed that an earlier divided Commission decision involving GAF controlled the first two items. A Commission majority therefore affirmed items 4a and…

May 10, 1977 ·OSHRC
Mixed result
COMM

Schiavone Construction Co.

Fall protection and cylinder items affirmed, air hose item vacated

Schiavone Construction was building an interstate highway when an employee worked on pile-driver leads without fall protection, about 14 feet above a steel platform and 20 feet above protruding steel piles. The Commission upheld the serious personal protective equipment citation because the…

May 9, 1977 ·OSHRC
Mixed result
COMM

Texaco, Inc.

Commission vacates a judge's order and remands to consider an amendment request

This is a brief procedural order in a case involving Texaco, Inc. The Commission directed the case for review on its own authority under 29 U.S.C. § 661(i). It vacated an order that Administrative Law Judge McQuade had issued on April 7, 1977, and sent the case back to the judge so that he could…

May 6, 1977 ·OSHRC
Procedural
COMM

Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Company

Settlement approved after union received a hearing

OSHA cited metal-products fabricator Geuder, Paeschke & Frey for one serious general duty clause violation and 44 nonserious violations. The Secretary and employer proposed a settlement that deleted several nonserious items, extended two abatement periods, reduced three proposed penalties, and…

May 6, 1977 ·OSHRC
Settled
COMM

Marion Stephens, d/b/a Chapman & Stephens Company

General duty violation affirmed for work near a power line

Chapman & Stephens grew citrus and used 20-foot steel sprinkler pipes in a grove crossed by a low 7,200-volt power line. While three workers removed a bent pipe near the line, the pipe contacted it, killing one employee, rendering another unconscious, and knocking the supervisor to the ground. The…

May 6, 1977 ·OSHRC
Modified
COMM

Syracuse Rigging Co., Inc.

Hoist citation vacated because a new charge was not tried by consent

Syracuse Rigging used power drills to operate manual chain hoists while lowering a 68,800-pound tank, which fell and fatally injured an employee. OSHA cited the general duty clause and later added an alternative charge that the hoists did not let operators stand clear of the load. The judge…

May 6, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations vacated
COMM

Armco Steel Corporation

Housekeeping violations affirmed for wet and oily work areas

OSHA cited seven areas at Armco Steel's workplace for accumulations of oil, water, or grease, and the judge affirmed five of those subitems. Employees had reason to walk in or near the accumulations. Armco argued that the conditions were inherent or temporary, that they were corrected within a…

May 6, 1977 ·OSHRC
Citations affirmed

What these documents are

  • The agencies: Workplace-safety cases from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (OSHRC), mine-safety cases from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (FMSHRC), and environmental permit and penalty appeals from the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board (EAB). Each decision page names its agency.
  • Commission and Board decisions: Rulings by the agency's highest review level (the Commission at OSHRC and FMSHRC, the Environmental Appeals Board at EPA). These are citable as precedent, though a decision may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance.
  • ALJ decisions: Rulings by the agency's Administrative Law Judges after a hearing. When no Commissioner directs review, an ALJ decision becomes a final order that binds the parties in that case but is not binding precedent: under 29 U.S.C. § 661(j) at OSHRC, and after the 40-day window of 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) at FMSHRC.
  • Why finality matters: Every page here says which kind of decision you are reading, so you know whether it is precedent you can cite or a final order that only shows how one judge ruled on one set of facts.
  • Where they come from: Every page links the official public release from the deciding agency, and the full text on the page is that release. The plain-English summaries are written by Ezel.