Advance Stone Incorporated (ALJ decision, March 20, 1997)
Advance Stone Incorporated (FMSHRC YORK 96-24-M): Settlement approved for $229
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1997 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Advance Stone Incorporated faced three civil penalty citations at its New Milford Plant. Judge Jacqueline R. Bulluck approved a settlement reducing the proposed total from $554 to $229, after considering the Mine Act penalty criteria. The judge ordered payment within 30 days and dismissed the case after approving the settlement.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provision(s): 30 U.S.C. § 815(d), 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved and the civil penalty was set at $229.
- Key point: The ALJ approved a substantial penalty reduction after reviewing the settlement under the Mine Act criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
March 20, 1997
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : Docket No. YORK 96-24-M
Petitioner : A.C. No. 06-00636-05518
v. :
: New Milford Plant
ADVANCE STONE INCORPORATED,
:
Respondent
:
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Bulluck
This case is before me upon petition for assessment of civil penalty under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Athe Act@). Petitioner has filed a motion to approve settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. A reduction in penalty from $554.00 to $229.00 is proposed. The citations initial assessments, and the proposed settlement amounts are as follows:
Initial
Proposed
Citation No. Assessment Settlement
4426541 $252.00 $104.00
4426542 50.00 21.00
4426544 252.00 104.00
TOTAL $554.00 $229.001
I have considered the representatives and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $229.00 within 30 days of this order.
Jacqueline R. Bulluck
Administrative Law Judge
1
Motion for Approval of Settlement and Order contains mathematical error totalling penalty at $225.00, whereas $229.00 is corrected sum.
Page 2
Distribution:
Ralph R. Minichiello, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, One Congress Street, 11th Floor, P.O. Box 8396, Boston, MA 02114 (Certified Mail)
Mr. Paul Kovacs, President, Advanced Stone Inc., 33 Boardman Road, New Milford, CT 06776 (Certified Mail)
nt
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace