Construction Materials Corp. (ALJ decision, August 4, 1995)

Construction Materials Corp. (FMSHRC YORK 94-73-M): Settlement approved with reduced penalty

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
YORK 94-73-M
Decided
August 4, 1995
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Checked against source
2026-08-13

What's the rule today?

This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1995
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
ALJ decision, later reviewed by the Commission
This decision was issued by an FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge, but it was not the final word in the case: the Commission directed review, and the Commission's decision is the one citable as precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Construction Materials Corp. and the Secretary proposed a settlement in a civil-penalty case. Judge Avram Weisberger found the settlement appropriate under the Mine Act's penalty criteria. He approved the settlement, reduced the proposed penalty from $645 to $516, and ordered payment within 30 days. The official index shows that the Commission reviewed the matter.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 30 U.S.C. § 815(d); 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved and the penalty was reduced from $645 to $516.
  • Key point: The judge approved a negotiated penalty reduction after reviewing the settlement materials and statutory penalty criteria.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)


[DOCID: f:y94-73m.wais]

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CORP.
August 4, 1995
YORK 94-73-M

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

August 4, 1995

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. YORK 94-73-M Petitioner : A.C. No. 37-00181-05505
v. :
: Construction Materials
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS CORP., :
Respondent :

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Weisberger

This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). Petitioner has filed a motion to approve settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. A reduction in penalty from $645 to $516 is proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.

WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $516 within 30 days of this order.

Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:

Gail E. Glick, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, One Congress Street, 11th Floor, P.O. Box 8396, Boston, MA 02114

John W. Douglas, III, Vice President, Construction Materials Corporation, 810 Fish Road, Tiverton, RI 02878

What controls your case today?

The Commission reviewed this case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts there and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace