Martha Perando v. Mettiki Coal Corporation (ALJ decision, September 9, 1986)
Martha Perando v. Mettiki Coal Corporation (FMSHRC YORK 85-12-D): Back pay and costs ordered
What's the rule today?
This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
After an earlier decision in Martha Perando's discrimination case, the parties submitted agreed amounts for damages, costs, and interest. Judge Gary Melick ordered Mettiki Coal Corporation to pay Perando $2,351.30 in back pay within 30 days. He also ordered interest through the payment date under the stated formula and $50 in costs. The order said it was the final disposition before the judge.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: None identified in this supplemental decision.
- Outcome: $2,351.30 in back pay, interest through payment, and $50 in costs ordered.
- Key point: The judge entered the parties' stipulated remedy amounts after the earlier ruling.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
MARHTA PERNANDO V. METTIKI COAL
DDATE:
19860909
TTEXT:
~1341
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
MARTHA PERANDO,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
Docket No. YORK 85-12-D
v. MSHA Case No. MORG CD 85-17
METTIKI COAL CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Before: Judge Melick
Pursuant to the decision in these proceedings dated August 12, 1986, the parties have submitted stipulations of damages, costs and interest. Accordingly the Mettiki Coal Corporation is ordered to pay to Complainant Martha Perando the amount of $2,351.30 in back pay within 30 days of the date of this decision plus interest to the date of payment computed in accordance with the formula set forth in Bailey v. Arkansas Carbona, Co., 5 FMSHRC 2042 (1983), plus costs of $50.
This decision constitutes the final disposition of these proceedings before this judge.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
What controls your case today?
The Commission reviewed this case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts there and answers your situation under current law, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace