Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Callanan Industries, Inc. (ALJ decision, January 23, 1984)
Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Callanan Industries, Inc. (FMSHRC YORK 79-99-M): $78 settlement approved on remand
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1984 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
On remand, one citation remained in MSHA's civil penalty case against Callanan Industries at its South Bethlehem Quarry and Mill. Callanan agreed to pay the full proposed $78 penalty for that citation. Judge Gary Melick considered the parties' settlement materials under the Mine Act's penalty criteria and approved the agreement. He ordered Callanan to pay $78 within 30 days. The released decision does not identify the standard underlying the remaining citation.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: The released order does not identify the standard for the remaining citation.
- Outcome: Settlement approved; Callanan ordered to pay $78.
- Key point: The judge found the full-payment settlement appropriate under the Mine Act's penalty criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. CALLANAN INDUSTRIES
DDATE:
19840123
TTEXT:
~139
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. YORK 79-99-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 30-00013-05003
v.
South Bethlehem Quarry
CALLANAN INDUSTRIES, INC.,
and Mill
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: William G. Staton, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, New York, New York, for Petitioner; Harry R. Hayes, Esq., Hayes & Lapitina, Albany, New York, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Melick
This case is before me on remand for reconsideration of a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 110(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). Petitioner has filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement as to the one remaining citation and to dismiss the case. Respondent has agreed to pay the proposed penalty of $78 in full. I have considered the representations and documentation in the case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $78 within 30 days of this order.
Gary Melick
Assistant Chief Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace