Secretary of Labor v. The Quikrete Companies
Secretary of Labor v. The Quikrete Companies (FMSHRC YORK 2021-0034): Misplaced assessment reopened after COVID-19 outbreak
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A proposed penalty assessment became final after Quikrete did not file a contest within 30 days. Quikrete explained that a COVID-19 outbreak left its office and plant understaffed and the assessment was inadvertently misplaced. After realizing it lacked the document, the company contacted MSHA and obtained a copy. The Secretary did not oppose reopening. The Commission reopened the assessment in the interest of justice, remanded it for further proceedings, and directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 C.F.R. §§ 100.7, 2700.1(b), and 2700.28; 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and remanded, with a penalty petition due within 45 days.
- Key point: An assessment misplaced while an office was understaffed during a COVID-19 outbreak qualified for reopening.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004‑1710
SECRETARY OF LABOR, :
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
:
:
v.
: Docket No. YORK 2021-0034
: A.C. No. 30-03558-529080
THE QUIKRETE COMPANIES :
BEFORE: Traynor, Chair; Althen and Rajkovich,
Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §
801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On April 2, 2021, the Commission received from
The Quikrete Companies’ (“Quikrete”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty
assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section
105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under
section 105(a), an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must
notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the
proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the
proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30
U.S.C. § 815(a).
We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction
to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders
under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc ., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May
1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission
has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under
which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission
on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason
justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges
shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a
harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause
for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate
proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc ., 17
FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
The Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”)
indicates that the proposed assessment was delivered to the operator on February
17, 2021. The assessment became a final order of the Commission on March 19,
2021.
Quikrete asserts that as a result of an ongoing COVID-19 outbreak
at its office and plant, the office was understaffed, and the proposed
assessment was misplaced. Realizing that it did not have the proposed
assessment, Quikrete states that it contacted MSHA to request a copy, which it
received on March 26, 2021. Quikrete has
not filed any other motions to reopen with the Commission in the last two
years. The Secretary does not
oppose the request to reopen but urges the operator to take steps to ensure
that future penalty contests are timely filed in accordance with MSHA’s regulations at 30 C.F.R. § 100.7 and the
Commission’s procedural rules.
Having
reviewed Quikrete’s request and the Secretary’s response, we find that the operator
inadvertently misplaced the proposed penalty assessment. In the interest of
justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative
Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s
Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28,
the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of
the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Arthur R. Traynor, III
Arthur
R. Traynor, III, Chair
/s/ William I. Althen
William
I. Althen, Commissioner
/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.
Marco M. Rajkovich Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Kevin Fick
Regional Operations Manager
Quikrete Stone, Ltd.
4993 Limeledge Road
Marcellus, NY 13108
John M. McCracken, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
Mine Safety and Health
Division
201 12th Street South, Suite
401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Archith Ramkumar, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
201 12th Street South, Suite
401
Arlington, VA 22202
April Nelson, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
Mine Safety and Health
Division
201 12th Street South, Suite
401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Melanie Garris
U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Civil Penalty
Compliance
Mine Safety and Health
Administration
201 12th Street South, Suite
401
Arlington, VA 22202-5452
Chief Administrative Law
Judge Glynn F. Voisin
Federal Mine Safety &
Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Suite 520N
Washington, DC 20004-1710
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2021. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.