Secretary of Labor v. ARJ Construction Company, Inc.
Secretary of Labor v. ARJ Construction Company, Inc. (FMSHRC YORK 2016-7): Default entered on $32,100 in penalties after a year of nonresponse
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2017 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA sought $32,100 in penalties from ARJ Construction Company over two alleged violations at the Taylor # 1 mine. The company answered the petition, but then let the case sit. Its counsel did not complete settlement discussions with the Solicitor over roughly nine months, missed a December 6 conference call, missed the rescheduled December 9 call, and never explained the second absence. Judge Priscilla M. Rae issued a show cause order and then a final show cause order warning that no further notices would follow, and the company signed for the final order but never replied. The judge found ARJ in default, citing both Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 and the Commission's own rules, dismissed the contest and hearing request, and ordered the full $32,100 paid within thirty days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): 30 U.S.C. § 820(c) (civil penalty proceeding); default entered under 29 C.F.R. § 2700.66 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 55
- Outcome: Default entered, contest and hearing request dismissed, and the full $32,100 in proposed penalties ordered paid within thirty days.
- Key point: Filing an answer does not preserve a contest; an operator that stops participating can lose the entire disputed penalty by default.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
1331 PENNSYLVANIA
AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC
20004-1710
TELEPHONE:
202-434-9956 / FAX: 202-434-9949
February 2, 2017
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA),
Petitioner,
v.
ARJ
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.,
Respondent.
CIVIL
PENALTY PROCEEDING
Docket
No. YORK 2016-7
A.C.
No. 18-00748-391227
Mine:
Taylor # 1
ORDER OF DEFAULT
AND ORDER TO PAY
This case is before me upon a petition
for assessment of civil penalties under section 110(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 820(c).
This docket involves two alleged
violations and total proposed penalties of $32,100.00. The Petition was filed
on November 10, 2015. Counsel for Respondent filed an Answer on his client’s
behalf December 16, 2015. When this docket was assigned to me on December 29,
2015, I issued a prehearing order directing the parties to engage in settlement
discussions to determine whether a hearing would be necessary. The parties were
further advised that failure to comply with the terms of the order could result
in an order to show cause and a finding of default.
On September 2, 2016, after the case had
been outstanding for nine months without apparent progress toward settlement,
my law clerk requested the parties’ availability for a conference call with me
to discuss scheduling a hearing. In response, Respondent’s counsel requested
additional time to look into the case and discuss his client’s position with
the Solicitor. However, after several months, the Solicitor advised that Respondent’s
counsel still had not been in contact with him.
I held a conference call on December 6,
2016 to discuss scheduling a hearing for this case. Respondent’s counsel failed
to appear despite having received two emails stating the date and time for the
call, including one that was sent to him the day before the call in response to
an email from his office asking what time the call would be held. Shortly after
missing the call, Respondent’s counsel phoned my law clerk, explained that his
office had confused the time for the call, and requested copies of the citations.
My clerk told him that a hearing needed to be scheduled and emailed him a copy
of the Petition.
The conference call was rescheduled for
the afternoon of December 9, 2016. My office sent an email to both parties
ordering them to appear. Counsel for Respondent again failed to appear. He did
not contact my office afterward to explain his failure to appear.
On December 13, 2016, I issued an Order
to Show Cause summarizing the procedural history of the case and directing
Respondent to explain why an order of default should not be issued against it given
its failure to comply with my order to engage in settlement discussions and
failure to appear on conference calls. My office did not receive any response.
On January 9, 2017, I issued a Final
Order to Show Cause again directing Respondent to explain why an order of
default should not be entered. Respondent was warned that if an explanation was
not filed within ten days of its receipt of the order, no further notices would
be issued, Respondent would be in default, its notice of contest and request
for hearing would be dismissed, and it would be ordered to pay the full amount
of the proposed penalties. The certified mail receipt shows that Respondent
received the Final Order to Show Cause on January 17, 2017. My office has not
received any response.
Respondent has failed to defend its case
and to comply with my orders and instructions, including my two Orders to Show
Cause and my instructions to engage in settlement discussions with the
Secretary, to provide its availability for hearing, and to attend conference
calls. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require entry of default against a
defendant who fails to plead or otherwise defend his case. Fed. R. Civ. Pro.
- The Commission’s procedural rules also permit a finding of default and
summary disposition of a case after issuance of a show cause order when a party
has failed to comply with a judge’s orders. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.66.
WHEREFORE , I find Respondent
to be IN DEFAULT .
Respondent’s notice of contest and
request for hearing are DISMISSED . Respondent is hereby ORDERED to
pay a total penalty of $32,100.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Order. [1]
/s/ Priscilla M.
Rae
Priscilla
M. Rae
Administrative
Law Judge
Distribution:
Anthony
M. Fassano, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, 170 South
Independence Mall West, Suite 630E, Philadelphia, PA 19106-3306
John
F. Leaberry, Esq., Law Office of John Leaberry, 106 Patrick Street, Lewisburg,
WV 24901
ARJ
Construction Company Inc., 201 South Jefferson Street, Lewisburg, WV 24901
[1] Checks or money
orders should be sent to: Mine Safety & Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, P.O. Box 790390, St. Louis, MO 63179-0390.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2017, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.