Secretary of Labor v. Harry C. Crooker & Sons, Inc. (Commission decision, November 5, 2013)
Secretary of Labor v. Harry C. Crooker & Sons, Inc. (FMSHRC YORK 2012-84-M): Default reopened after answer reached MSHA
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Harry C. Crooker & Sons failed to appear in the Commission's record as having answered a show-cause order, so the order became a final default. Crooker asserted that it had timely sent the answer to both the Commission and the Department of Labor, and MSHA confirmed receiving it on the deadline. The Secretary did not oppose relief. Guided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), the Commission reopened the proceeding in the interest of justice, vacated the default, and remanded for ordinary penalty litigation.
Decision snapshot
- Governing rules: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b), 2700.69(b), and 2700.70(a)
- Outcome: The final default order was reopened and vacated, and the case was remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
- Key point: Evidence that MSHA timely received an answer can justify reopening a final default when the Commission's own record lacks the filing.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Jean Ellen
Normal
Jean Ellen
2
0
2013-11-25T19:58:00Z
2013-11-25T19:58:00Z
2
647
3690
Microsoft
30
8
4329
14.00
Clean
Clean
false
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004‑1710
November
5, 2013
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
HARRY C. CROOKER & SONS, INC.
Docket No. YORK 2012 84-M
A.C. No. 17-00576-277211
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young, Cohen, Nakamura, and Althen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On March 8, 2013, the Commission received from Harry C. Crooker & Sons, Inc., (“Crooker”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the default order entered against it.
On July 24, 2012, the Chief
Administrative Law Judge issued an Order to Show Cause which by its terms became a Default Order if the operator did not file an answer within 30 days. This Order to Show Cause was issued in response to Crooker’s failure to answer the Secretary of Labor’s February 16, 2012 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. The Commission does not have a record of receiving Crooker’s answer within 30 days, so the default order became effective on August 24, 2012.
Crooker asserts that it sent its
timely answer to the Show Cause Order to the Department of Labor and to the Commission. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen and notes that MSHA received Crooker’s answer on August 24, 2012.
The judge’s jurisdiction in this matter terminated when the default occurred. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission’s procedural rules, relief from a judge’s decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). If the Commission does not direct review within 40 days of a decision’s issuance, it becomes a final decision of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). Consequently, the judge’s order here has become a final decision of the Commission.
In evaluating requests to reopen
final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993).
Having reviewed Crooker’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Default Order. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ Mary Lu
Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/Michael G.
Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F.
Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K.
Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
/s/ William I.
Althen
William I. Althen, Commissioner
Distribution:
Richard Perkins
Safety Director
Harry C. Crooker & Sons, Inc.
103 Lewiston Rd.
P.O. Box 5001
Topsham, Maine 04086
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004-1710
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace