New England Sand and Gravel, Inc.
New England Sand and Gravel, Inc. (FMSHRC YORK 2012-65-M): Late contest reopened after forms failed to reach counsel
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
New England Sand and Gravel asked the Commission to reopen a penalty assessment that became final after the contest deadline passed. The company said it tried to send all proposed assessment forms to counsel. Counsel received and timely contested the section 110(c) penalties but did not receive the separate forms covering the section 104(d) orders. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but urged the company to prevent future late contests. The Commission reopened the assessment in the interests of justice, remanded for further proceedings, and directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 801 and 815(a); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b) and 2700.28
- Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and remanded, with a penalty petition due within 45 days.
- Key point: Reopening may be granted when an operator attempts to route multiple assessment forms to counsel but a separate group of orders does not arrive.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
August 15, 2012
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
NEW ENGLAND SAND AND
GRAVEL, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. YORK 2012-65-M
A.C. No. 37-00107-271336
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On December 27, 2011, the Commission received from New
England Sand and Gravel, Inc. (“NESG”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that
had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed
penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment
is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to
reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a).
Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to
reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief
from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.
See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable
by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed
that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause
for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the
merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
The record indicates that the proposed assessment was delivered on November 9, 2011,
and became a final order of the Commission on December 9, 2011. NESG asserts that it
attempted to send its counsel all the proposed assessment forms, but counsel only received and
timely contested the 110(c) penalties in proposed assessment No. 000271074A. Counsel never
received the 104(d) orders in proposed assessment No. 000271336. The Secretary does not
oppose the request to reopen, but urges the operator to take steps to ensure that future penalty
contests are timely filed.
Having reviewed NESG’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interests of justice,
we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further
proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part
2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of
penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/ Michael F. Duffy
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
/s/Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Justin M. Winter, Esq.
Law Office of Adele L. Abrams, P.C.
4740 Corridor Place, Suite D
Beltsville, MD 20705
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2012. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.