Brown Excavation Company, Inc. (Commission decision, January 6, 2011)
Brown Excavation Company, Inc. (FMSHRC YORK 2010-239-M): Show cause issued over paid penalties
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2011, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Brown Excavation asked the Commission to reopen two final penalty assessments, and the Secretary opposed the requests. MSHA's data system later showed that Brown had paid the penalties, but neither party filed an update after the initial pleadings. The Commission ordered Brown to explain within 30 days why reopening should not be denied as moot. Brown did not respond, and the later order in york-2010-239-m-commission denied the requests as moot.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 801 and 815(a)
- Outcome: Brown was ordered to show cause within 30 days why its reopening requests should not be denied as moot.
- Key point: Payment of the penalties raised a mootness issue that required the operator to explain whether any live dispute remained.
- Subsequent order: york-2010-239-m-commission denied reopening as moot after no response.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
January 6, 2011
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
BROWN EXCAVATION COMPANY, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. YORK 2010-239-M
A.C. No. 30-02994-206555
Docket No. YORK 2010-240-M
A.C. No. 30-02994-211798
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
These matters arise under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”).
On May 4, 2010, the Commission received from Brown
Excavation Company (“Brown”) a letter seeking to reopen penalty assessments that had become final orders of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
On May 26, 2010, the Secretary of Labor filed oppositions to the operator’s request to reopen.
It appears from a review of the Data Retrieval System maintained by the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) that the operator has paid the civil penalties that are the subject of its request to reopen. The parties have not filed pleadings subsequent to the May 2010 pleadings to inform the Commission of any change in status of these proceedings.
Brown is hereby ordered to show cause within 30 days of the date of this order why its request to reopen should not be denied as moot.
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Jodi Flaherty
Brown Excavation Co., Inc.
2735 State Rte. 49
West Monroe, NY 13167
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace