Tri-Star Mining, Inc. (ALJ decision, May 12, 2009)

Tri-Star Mining, Inc. (FMSHRC YORK 2007-76-R, et al.): Six highwall violations settled for $105,324

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
YORK 2007-76-R, YORK 2007-77-R, YORK 2007-78-R, YORK 2007-79-R, YORK 2007-80-R, YORK 2007-81-R, YORK 2007-101, YORK 2008-52, YORK 2008-108
Decided
May 12, 2009
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-08

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2009 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2009
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision under the Mine Act's 40-day rule
This administrative law judge decision became a final decision of the Commission because no Commissioner directed review within 40 days, under 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). It is binding on the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA issued six citations and orders after a highwall collapse fatally injured equipment operators Dale Jones and Michael Wilt at Tri-Star Mining's surface facility. The alleged violations involved highwall stability planning, work near dangerous highwalls, inspections and records, bench dimensions, and examinations after weather events. The parties agreed to reduce the proposed penalties from $185,324 to $105,324 because of litigation uncertainty about how foreseeable the dangerous highwall conditions were. Two orders were modified to section 104(a) citations by removing their unwarrantable-failure findings. Judge Jerold Feldman approved the settlement, allowing payment in twelve monthly installments of $8,777.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 77.1000, 77.1003, 77.1004(a), 77.1006(a), 77.1713(a), and 77.1713(c)
  • Outcome: Six violations were settled for $105,324, with two unwarrantable-failure findings removed.
  • Key point: The settlement reduced penalties to reflect uncertainty over whether the hazardous highwall conditions were foreseeable.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FMSHRC ALJ Decision

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001

May 12, 2009

TRI-STAR MINING, INC.,

Contestant

v.

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Respondent

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Petitioner

v.

TRI-STAR MINING, INC.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CONTEST PROCEEDINGS

Docket No. YORK 2007-76-R

Citation No. 6604148; 07/09/2007

Docket No. YORK 2007-77-R

Citation No. 6604149; 07/09/2007

Docket No. YORK 2007-78-R

Citation No. 6604150; 07/09/2007

Docket No. YORK 2007-79-R

Citation No. 6604621; 07/09/2007

Docket No. YORK 2007-80-R

Order No. 6604622; 07/09/2007

Docket No. YORK 2007-81-R

Order No. 7146873; 07/09/2007

CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS

Docket No. YORK 2007-101

A.C. No. 18-00713-125178

Docket No. YORK 2008-52

A.C. No. 18-00713-131071

Docket No. YORK 2008-108

A.C. No. 18-00713-138815

Job # 3

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Feldman 

The captioned civil penalty and contest cases are before me based upon Petitions for Assessment of Civil Penalties filed pursuant to section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended, 30 U.S.C. § 815(d) (“Mine Act”). These proceedings concern six alleged violations of the Secretary’s mandatory safety standards of Part 77, 30 C.F.R. Part 77, governing surface coal mines. The citations and orders citing the subject violations were issued as a result of a Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) investigation of an April 17, 2007, highwall accident at Tri-Staring Mining, Inc.’s (“Tri-Star’s”) surface facility. As a result of the accident, Dale Jones and Michael Wilt were fatally injured when they were exposed to a highwall collapse that occurred while they were operating equipment at the bottom of the pit.

The citations and orders in issue allege violations of 30 C.F.R § 77.1000 that requires the mine operator to establish a plan to insure highwall bank stability; 30 C.F.R. § 77.1006(a) that prohibits men from working near dangerous highwalls; 30 C.F.R. § 77.1713(a) that requires on-shift inspections for hazardous conditions; 30 C.F. R. § 77.1713(c) that requires the mine operator to maintain an inspection book noting the remedial action taken with respect to hazardous conditions noted during on-shift inspections; 30 C.F. R. § 77.1003 the requires the width and height of benches to be determined by the type of equipment in use; and 30 C.F. R. § 77.1004(a) that requires highwalls to be examined for hazards after every rain, freeze or thaw.

These proceedings were scheduled for hearing on July 21, 2009. On May 6, 2009, the Secretary filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement and to dismiss these proceedings. A reduction in civil penalty from $185,324.00 to $105,324 is proposed. The significant reduction in penalty apparently is based on the vagaries of litigation with respect to the extent that dangerous highwall conditions were foreseeable. In this regard, the parties have agreed that Order No. 6604622 concerning exposing miners to dangerous highwall conditions, and Order No. 6604148 concerning Tri-Star’s failure to record hazardous highwall conditions in an on-shift examination book, shall be modified to 104(a) citations reflecting that the cited violations were not attributable to Tri-Star’s unwarrantable failure.

I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in these matters and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. § 820(i). WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement IS GRANTED, and IT IS ORDERED that the respondent pay a total civil penalty of $105,324.00 in satisfaction of the six cited violations. Pursuant to the parties agreement, the $105,324.00 civil penalty will be paid in twelve (12) monthly installments. The first monthly payment of
$8,777.00 is due on July 1, 2009, and shall be followed by monthly payments of $8,777.00 on the first of each subsequent month, until the full amount of $105,324.00 has been paid and received.

Payment shall be sent to the U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration, P.O. Box 790390, St. Louis, Missouri, 63179. Each check shall be made payable to the U.S. Department of Labor/MSHA. Failure to make any installment payment within 30 days of the due date will result in the remaining balance of the $105,324.00 civil penalty becoming due and payable immediately. Upon timely receipt of the entire $105,324.00 civil penalty, the captioned contest and civil penalty matters ARE DISMISSED.

Jerold Feldman

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: (Regular and Certified Mail)

Ronald Gurka, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, 1100 Wilson Boulevard,

22nd Floor, West, Arlington, VA 22209-2247

Adele L. Abrams, Esq., Law Office of Adele L. Abrams, P.C., 4740 Corridor Place, Suite D, Beltsville, MD 20705

/rps

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace