BSC Construction, Inc. (Commission decision, March 23, 1995)
BSC Construction, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 94-401): Default order vacated and remanded
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1995, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
BSC Construction, Inc. failed to answer a proposed civil penalty assessment and an ALJ's order to show cause. The ALJ entered default and assessed the Secretary's proposed $800 in civil penalties. BSC later sent letters that the Commission treated as a timely petition for discretionary review. The Commission vacated the default order and remanded the case so the ALJ could decide whether default was warranted.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 801; 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b)
- Outcome: The ALJ's default order was vacated and the matter was remanded for further proceedings.
- Key point: The Commission treated BSC's appeal letter as a timely discretionary-review petition and remanded for a determination on default.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
[DOCID: f:bsc.wais]
BSC CONSTRUCTION, INC.
March 23, 1995
WEVA 94-401
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1730 K STREET N.W., 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
March 23, 1995
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : Docket No. WEVA 94-401 :
v. :
:
BSC CONSTRUCTION, INC.
:
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Doyle, Holen and Marks, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This civil penalty proceeding arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (1988) ("Mine Act"). On February 21, 1995, Chief Administrative Law Judge Paul Merlin issued an Order of Default to BSC Construction, Inc. ("BSC") for failing to answer the proposal for assessment of penalty filed by the Secretary of Labor on October 11, 1994, or the judge's Order to Respondent to Show Cause of December 21, 1994. The judge assessed the civil penalties of $800 proposed by the Secretary.
On March 2, 1995, the Commission received a letter from Roger Glover, BSC's operations manager, in which Glover states that BSC had mailed a "letter of appeal" on August 25, 1994, to Caryl Casden, an attorney with the Department of Labor's Regional Solicitor's Office in Arlington, Virginia. Glover states that, after he was informed that his letter had not been received and, after receiving the show cause order, he mailed another appeal letter to Casden by certified mail. He enclosed a copy of that letter, dated January 5, 1995, and a certified mail receipt dated January 9, 1995.
The judge's jurisdiction in this matter terminated when his decision was issued on February 21, 1995. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission's procedural rules, relief from a judge's decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C.
§823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. letter to be a timely filed petition for discretionary review, which we grant. See, e.g., Middle States Resources, Inc., 10 FMSHRC 1130 (September 1988).
On the basis of the present record, we are unable to evaluate the merits of BSC's position. In the interest of justice, we remand this matter to the judge, who shall determine whether default is warranted. See Hickory Coal Co., 12 FMSHRC 1201, 1202 (June 1990).
For the reasons set forth above, we vacate the judge's default order and remand this matter for further proceedings.
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner
Arlene Holen, Commissioner
Marc Lincoln Marks, Commissioner
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace