BSC Construction, Inc.

Plain-English summary

BSC Construction, Inc. failed to answer a proposed civil penalty assessment and an ALJ's order to show cause. The ALJ entered default and assessed the Secretary's proposed $800 in civil penalties. BSC later sent letters that the Commission treated as a timely petition for discretionary review. The Commission vacated the default order and remanded the case so the ALJ could decide whether default was warranted.

Decision snapshot

• Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 801; 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b)
• Outcome: The ALJ's default order was vacated and the matter was remanded for further proceedings.
• Key point: The Commission treated BSC's appeal letter as a timely discretionary-review petition and remanded for a determination on default.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

[DOCID: f:bsc.wais]

BSC CONSTRUCTION, INC.
March 23, 1995
WEVA 94-401

       FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

                1730 K STREET N.W., 6TH FLOOR

                   WASHINGTON,  D.C.  20006


                        March 23, 1995

SECRETARY OF LABOR, :
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : Docket No. WEVA 94-401
:
v. :
:
BSC CONSTRUCTION, INC. :

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Doyle, Holen and Marks, Commissioners

                            ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

 This civil penalty proceeding arises under the Federal  Mine

Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (1988)
("Mine Act"). On February 21, 1995, Chief Administrative Law Judge
Paul Merlin issued an Order of Default to BSC Construction, Inc.
("BSC") for failing to answer the proposal for assessment of
penalty filed by the Secretary of Labor on October 11, 1994, or the
judge's Order to Respondent to Show Cause of December 21, 1994. The
judge assessed the civil penalties of $800 proposed by the Secretary.

 On  March  2,  1995,  the  Commission received a letter from Roger

Glover, BSC's operations manager, in which Glover states that
BSC had mailed a "letter of appeal" on August 25, 1994, to Caryl
Casden, an attorney with the Department of Labor's Regional Solicitor's
Office in Arlington, Virginia. Glover states that, after he was
informed that his letter had not been received and, after receiving
the show cause order, he mailed another appeal letter to Casden
by certified mail. He enclosed a copy of that letter, dated
January 5, 1995, and a certified mail receipt dated January 9, 1995.

 The judge's jurisdiction in this matter terminated when his

decision was issued on February 21, 1995. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b).
Under the Mine Act and the Commission's procedural rules, relief
from a judge's decision may be sought by filing a petition for
discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C.
§823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. letter to be a timely filed petition for
discretionary review, which we grant. See, e.g., Middle States
Resources, Inc., 10 FMSHRC 1130 (September 1988).

 On the basis of the present record, we are unable to evaluate

the merits of BSC's position. In the interest of justice, we remand
this matter to the judge, who shall determine whether default
is warranted. See Hickory Coal Co., 12 FMSHRC 1201, 1202 (June
1990).

 For the reasons set forth above, we vacate the judge's default

order and remand this matter for further proceedings.

                              Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman

                              Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner

                              Arlene Holen, Commissioner

                              Marc Lincoln Marks, Commissioner