Mutual Mining Incorporated (ALJ decision, October 31, 1994)
Mutual Mining Incorporated (FMSHRC WEVA 94-284-C): Default compensation order issued
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1994 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Mutual Mining Incorporated was ordered to answer a complaint for compensation within 30 days or explain why it could not do so. The company did not respond to that order. Judge Gary Melick therefore found the company in default and ordered it to pay compensation within 30 days to the miners listed in Exhibit E to the complaint, with interest through the date of payment. The interest was to be calculated under formulas identified in prior Commission decisions.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1), the 40-day finality rule for ALJ decisions
- Outcome: Mutual Mining was found in default and ordered to pay the specified compensation and interest.
- Key point: Failure to answer a compensation complaint or explain the failure resulted in a default order requiring payment.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
UMWA (LOCAL 5817) V. MUTUAL MINING INC. DDATE: 19941031 TTEXT:
Page 2
~2184
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF
: COMPENSATION PROCEEDING
AMERICA ON BEHALF OF
:
LOCAL 5817,
: Docket No. WEVA 94-284-C
Complainants :
v. :
: Mutual No. 1 Mine
MUTUAL MINING INCORPORATED, :
Respondent :
DEFAULT DECISION
Before: Judge Melick
On August 1, 1994, Respondent, Mutual Mining Incorporated, was ordered to file an Answer to the Complaint for Compensation within 30 days of that date or show good reason for failing to do so.
To date no response to the above order has been received.
Accordingly, Respondent is in default and is hereby ORDERED to pay compensation within 30 days of the date of this order to the miners listed in Exhibit \"E\" attached to the Complaint for Compensation and in the amounts enumerated, plus interest to the date of payment, calculated in accordance with the formula set forth by the Commission in Secretary on behalf of Bailey v. Arkansas-Carbona Co., 5 FMSHRC 2642 (1983) and as applicable, Loc. U. 2274, UMWA v. Clinchfield Coal Co., 10 FMSHRC 1493 (1988), aff'd sub nom. Clinchfield Coal Co. v. FMSHRC, No. 88-1873 (D.C. Cir., February 9, 1990).
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Judith Rivlin, Esq., United Mine Workers of America, 900 Fifteenth St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005 (Certified Mail)
Allen Roe, Superintendent, Mutual Mining Inc., Route 1, Box 695, Sandy Hook, KY 41171 (Certified Mail)
/lh
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace