Consolidation Coal Company (ALJ decision, March 5, 1993)
Consolidation Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 93-64): Employee-hour reporting violations affirmed with $1,200 penalty
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Consolidation Coal was cited for overreporting employee hours on its quarterly employment and coal production reports. Judge Paul Merlin treated the case as controlled by an earlier summary decision involving the same issue and found that summary decision was appropriate because no material fact was disputed. The earlier decision required penalties of $100 for each violation rather than the Secretary's proposed $500 penalty. The twelve citations were affirmed and a total penalty of $1,200 was assessed.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 50.30-1(g)(3).
- Outcome: Twelve overreporting citations were affirmed and $1,200 in penalties was assessed.
- Key point: When the material facts are undisputed, an earlier controlling summary decision can determine the penalty for the same reporting violation.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEVA 93-64 Petitioner : A.C. No. 46-01867-03937
v. :
: Blacksville No. 1
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, :
Respondent :
SUMMARY DECISION
Before: Judge Merlin
The above captioned case is a petition for the assessment of civil penalties filed by the Secretary of Labor against Consolidation Coal Company pursuant to section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.A. 815(d), and section 2700.27 of Commission regulations, 29 C.F.R. 2700.27. The twelve citations which were issued under section 104(a) of the Act, 30 U.S.C.A. 814(a), charge violations of section 50.30-1(g)(3) of the Secretary's regulations, 30 C.F.R. 50.30-1(g)(3), for overreporting of employee hours on the Quarterly Employment and Coal Production Report (MSHA Form 7000-2).
This case involves the same issue as in Consolidation Coal Co., Docket No. WEVA 93-7, wherein the parties filed cross motions for summary decision. 14 FMSHRC (March 4, 1993). In that case, I determined that summary decision was proper under Commission rules, 29 C.F.R. 2700.64(b), since no issue of material fact was in dispute, but rather only the appropriate amount of penalties to be assessed in accordance with statutory criteria. 30 U.S.C.A. 820(i). To date the parties in this case have not filed cross motions. However, since the issues and parties in this case are identical to those in WEVA 93-7 (only different mines are involved) I find that summary decision lies here as well.
In Docket No. WEVA 93-7, the summary decision rejected the Secretary's motion for imposition of a $500 penalty for each overreporting of employee hours subsequent to my May 24, 1990, decision in Consolidation Coal Co., 12 FMSHRC 1129, but prior to the Commission's June 9, 1992, decision, 14 FMSHRC 956. The summary decision in WEVA 93-7 is controlling and therefore, penalties of $100 each should be assessed for the violations herein.
In light of the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the Secretary's findings of violations for the twelve citations in the subject penalty petition be AFFIRMED.
It is further ORDERED that penalties of $1,200 be ASSESSED and that the operator PAY such penalties within 30 days from the date of this decision.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Robert S. Wilson, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Room 516, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)
Daniel E. Rogers, Esq., Consolidation Coal Company, Consol Plaza, 1800 Washington Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15241-1421 (Certified Mail)
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace