Mutual Mining, Inc. (ALJ decision, August 2, 1996)

Mutual Mining, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 93-394-D, et al.): Full back pay ordered after remand

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
WEVA 93-394-D, WEVA 93-395-D, WEVA 93-396-D, WEVA 93-397-D, WEVA 93-398-D
Decided
August 2, 1996
Presiding judge
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Checked against source
2026-08-12

What's the rule today?

This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1996
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
ALJ decision, later reviewed by the Commission
This decision was issued by an FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge, but it was not the final word in the case: the Commission directed review, and the Commission's decision is the one citable as precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Judge Arthur J. Amchan had previously found that Mutual Mining violated section 105(c) by discharging five complainants. He had ordered back-pay amounts for Cletis Wamsley, Clark D. Williamson, Samuel Coyle, John B. Taylor, and Robert A. Lewis, subject to subtracting unemployment compensation under the Commission precedent then in effect. After a Fourth Circuit decision and a Commission remand, the judge ordered Mutual Mining to pay the listed amounts in full and to restore any back pay previously returned to the company. The cases were to be dismissed after payment within 45 calendar days.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: Full back pay was ordered for five complainants after remand, and the cases were to be dismissed after payment.
  • Key point: The remand required the operator to pay the previously ordered back-pay amounts without subtracting unemployment compensation.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

+FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

August 2, 1996

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
:
ON BEHALF OF
:
CLETIS R. WAMSLEY,
: Docket No. WEVA 93-394-D
: Hope CD 93-01, 93-01
:
ROBERT A. LEWIS,
: Docket No. WEVA 93-395-D
: Hope CD 93-02
:
JOHN B. TAYLOR,
: Docket No. WEVA 93-396-D
: Hope CD 93-04
:
CLARK D. WILLIAMSON, AND
: Docket No. WEVA 93-397-D
: Hope CD 93-07
:
SAMUEL COYLE,
: Docket No. WEVA 93-398-D
Complainants : Hope CD 93-11
v. :
: Mutual Mine I
MUTUAL MINING, INC.,
:
Respondent
:

DECISION ON DAMAGES FOLLOWING REMAND

Before: Judge Amchan

On June 24, 1994, I found that Respondent had violated section 105(c) of the Act in discharging the Complainants on December 21, 1992. Subsequently, on November 30, 1994, I granted the Secretary of Labor's motion for summary judgment on the issue of damages. I ordered Respondent to pay the following amounts to the respective Complainants:

Cletis Wamsley
$35,880.88
Clark D. Williamson $ 5,203.31
Samuel Coyle
$19,667.81
John B. Taylor
$23,132.15
Robert A. Lewis
$46,825.73

16 FMSHRC 2371, 2372.

However, in accordance with Commission precedent at the time, I stated that Complainants must subtract any amounts received in unemployment compensation benefits from the back pay


Page 2

award and return those amounts to Respondent, if such amounts had been paid, 16 FMSHRC 2372 n. 1.

In accordance with the decision of the Court of Appeals decision in Secretary of Labor v. Mutual Mining, Inc., 80 F.3d 110(4th Cir. 1996) and the ensuing Commission remand order, I hereby order Respondent to pay the amounts stated above in full. If any back-pay has been returned to Respondent pursuant to my November, 1994 decision, Respondent is ORDERED to pay these amounts back to the individual Complainants within 45 calendar days of this decision. Upon payment of these amounts these cases are dismissed.

Arthur J. Amchan
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Robert S. Wilson, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Room 516, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)

W. Jeffrey Scott, Esq., 311 Main Street, P.O. Box 608, Grayson, KY 41143 (Certified Mail)

Mr. Johnny Porter, Route 1, Box 700, Sandy Hook, KY 41171 (Certified Mail)

dcp

2

What controls your case today?

The Commission reviewed this case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts there and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace