Link M. Smith, Jim Altizer and Gary Ritchie v. Consolidation Coal Company
Smith, Altizer and Ritchie v. Consolidation Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 93-343-D): Discrimination case dismissed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1994 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary asked to withdraw the discrimination complaint brought on behalf of Link M. Smith, Jim Altizer, and Gary Ritchie against Consolidation Coal Company. The request relied on the Commission's decision in Swift et al. v. Consolidation Coal Co. The administrative law judge granted permission to withdraw under 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11 and dismissed the case.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11
- Outcome: The Secretary's withdrawal request was granted and the discrimination case was dismissed.
- Key point: The judge dismissed the case after allowing the Secretary to withdraw the complaint.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) & L.M. SMITH & J. ALTIZER & G. RITCHIE
V. CONSOLIDATION COAL CO.
DDATE:
19941017
TTEXT:
Page 2
~2119
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : Docket No. WEVA 93-343-D
ON BEHALF OF LINK M. SMITH, : MSHA Case No. HOPE CD 92-08
JIM ALTIZER AND GARY RITCHIE, :
Complainants :
v. : Amonate No. 31 Mine and Prep
:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, :
Respondent :
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Melick
The Secretary requests approval to withdraw his Complaint
in the captioned case in reliance upon the Commission's decision
in Swift et al v. Consolidation Coal Co., 16 FMSHRC 201 (1994).
Under the circumstances herein, permission to withdraw is
granted. 29 C.F.R. 2700.11. This case is therefore DISMISSED.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Douglas N. White, Counsel, Trial Litigation, Office of
the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Blvd.,
Suite 400, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)
Laura E. Beverage, Esq., Jackson and Kelly, 1600 Laidley
Tower, P.O. Box 553, Charleston, WV 25322 (Certified Mail)
Laura Mason Eddy, Regional Counsel, Consolidation Coal
Company, 1800 Washington Road, Consol Plaza, Pittsburgh,
PA 15241-1421 (Certified Mail)
Warren R. McGraw, II, General Counsel, District 29, UMWA,
Chilson Avenue at Raleigh Road, P.O. Box 511, Beckley,
WV 25802-0511 (Certified Mail)
/lh
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1994, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.