Oneida Coal Co., Inc.
Oneida Coal Co., Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 92-986): Settlement addendum modifies negligence findings
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Oneida Coal Company, Inc. and the Secretary of Labor submitted an addendum describing their settlement of a civil penalty proceeding involving Oneida Mine No. 1. Under the agreement, the Secretary would change the negligence finding from moderate to none on Citation No. 3309235. The Secretary would also change the negligence finding from moderate to no finding on Citations Nos. 3110789 and 3110790. Oneida agreed to pay the penalty assessment, and the parties asked the judge to approve the settlement.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None stated in the official addendum.
- Outcome: The parties moved for approval of a settlement that changed the negligence findings on three citations, with Oneida agreeing to pay the penalty assessment.
- Key point: The proposed settlement reduced or removed the negligence findings without changing the citation numbers identified in the addendum.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL V. ONEIDA COAL
DDATE:
199304
TTEXT:
Page 2
~671
APPENDIX TO DECISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW CORPORATION
LYNN MARTIN, Secretary of Labor, ) CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
United States Department of Labor, )
)
)
Petitioner, ) Docket No. WEVA 92-986
v. ) No. 46-05243-03624
)
Oneida Coal Co., INC., ) Mine: Oneida Mine No. 1
) SOL No. 92-39276
)
ADDENDUM TO
JOINT MOTION FOR
APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
This day came the parties, by counsel, and represented to
the Court that they have reached an agreement as to the issues to
dispute herein whereby the Secretary agrees to modify its finding
of.. negligence from "moderate" to "none" on Citation Number
3309235 and to modify its finding of negligence from "moderate"
to "no finding" on Citations Number 3110789 and 3110790 and
whereby Oneida Coal Company, Inc. agrees to pay the penalty
assessment. Wherefore, the parties hereby move the Court for
approval of their settlement.
Dated this day of March, 1993
W. Henry Lawrence IV
Counsel for Respondent
Oneida Coal., Co., Inc.
Glen M. Loos, Esquire
Department of Labor
4015 Wilson Boulevard, Room 516
Arlington, Virginia 22203
Counsel for Petitioner
Secretary of Labor
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1993, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.