Oneida Coal Company, Inc. (ALJ decision, April 13, 1993)
Oneida Coal Company, Inc. (FMSHRC WEVA 92-986): Settlement approved for $10,020
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Oneida Coal Company faced a civil-penalty proceeding under the Mine Act. At the hearing, the Secretary moved to approve a settlement and dismiss the case, and Oneida agreed to pay the proposed $10,020 penalty in full. Judge Gary Melick found the settlement appropriate under the statutory penalty criteria, approved it, and ordered payment within 30 days. The decision did not make independent findings on the underlying alleged violation.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d) and 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved and Oneida was ordered to pay $10,020 within 30 days.
- Key point: The judge approved a full-penalty settlement after reviewing the parties' representations and supporting documentation.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
: Docket No. WEVA 92-986
Petitioner : A.C. No. 46-05243-03624
v. :
: Oneida No. 1 Mine
ONEIDA COAL COMPANY, INC., :
Respondent :
DECISION
Appearances: Glenn M. Loos, Esquire, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner;
W. Henry Lawrence, Esquire, Steptoe and Johnson, Charleston, West Virginia for Respondent
Before: Judge Melick
This case is before me upon a petition for assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearings, Petitioner filed a motion to approve settlement agreement and to dismiss the case. Respondent has agreed to pay the proposed penalty of $10,020 in full. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, including the addendum to the settlement agreement attached hereto as an appendix, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $10,020 within 30 days of this order.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
703-756-6261
Distribution:
Glenn M. Loos, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Room 516, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)
W. Henry Lawrence, IV., Esq., Steptoe and Johnson, Sixth Floor, Union National Center East, P.O. Box 2190, Clarksburg, WV 26302-2190 (Certified Mail)
/lh
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace