W-P Coal Company (Commission decision, September 18, 1995)

W-P Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 92-746): Appeal withdrawn and proceeding dismissed

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
WEVA 92-746
Decided
September 18, 1995
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-13

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1995, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1995
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It granted W-P Coal Company’s motion to withdraw its appeal, vacated the Commission’s direction for review, and dismissed the proceeding. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

W-P Coal Company asked to withdraw its appeal after reaching a settlement with the Secretary in related proceedings. The Commission noted that an administrative law judge had approved that settlement and dismissed the related cases. It granted the motion, vacated its direction for review, and dismissed this proceeding.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing authorities: 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.; 30 U.S.C. § 823(c)
  • Outcome: The appeal withdrawal was granted, the direction for review was vacated, and the proceeding was dismissed.
  • Key point: The Commission dismissed the appeal after the parties’ related settlement was approved by the judge.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006

September 18, 1995

W-P COAL COMPANY
:
:
v. : Docket No. WEVA 92-746
:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
:

BEFORE: Doyle, Holen and Marks, Commissioners1

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

In this civil penalty proceeding arising under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. ' 801 et seq. (1988) (AMine Act@), W-P Coal Company (AW-P@) has filed with the Commission a Motion to Withdraw Appeal. The Secretary of Labor (ASecretary@) has not filed a response.

On January 9, 1995, the Commission granted W-P=s petition for discretionary review of a decision of Administrative Law Judge Gary Melick in Docket No. WEVA 92-746. In the present motion, filed June 5, 1995, W-P states that the Secretary and W-P entered into a settlement agreement as to other related proceedings pending before Judge Melick, which had been stayed pending final disposition of Docket No. WEVA 92-746, and that, as a part of the settlement agreement, W-P agreed to withdraw its appeal in the instant proceeding. Mot. at 1-2. W-P requests that, upon Judge Melick=s approval of the settlement of the related proceedings, this proceeding be dismissed. Id. at 2.
Judge Melick has approved the settlement and dismissed the proceedings before him.

1
Cha irm a n Jorda n ha s recu sed herself in this m a tter. Pu rsu a nt to section 113( c) of the M ine A ct, 30 U.S.C. ' 823( c), w e ha ve desig na ted ou rselves a pa nel of three m em bers to exercise the pow ers of the Com m ission.


Page 2

Upon consideration of the motion, we grant it. Accordingly, the Commission=s direction for review in this matter is vacated and this proceeding is dismissed.

Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner

Arlene Holen, Commissioner

Marc Lincoln Marks, Commissioner

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace