Consolidation Coal Company (ALJ decision, March 9, 1993)

Consolidation Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 92-1011): Settlement approved and negligence reduced

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEVA 92-1011
Decided
March 9, 1993
Presiding judge
Outcome
Modified
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-15

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Consolidation Coal agreed to settle two violations involving equipment at its Arkwright No. 1 Mine. Judge Paul Merlin approved the settlement, kept the originally assessed penalty for one citation, and modified the other citation by reducing negligence from moderate to low. The total proposed settlement was $265, reduced from originally assessed penalties of $338, and the order required payment within 30 days. The modified citation involved a conduit pulled out of the gland on a continuous-mining-machine emergency-stop switch.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 75.503
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, Citation No. 3717916 was modified from moderate to low negligence, and a $265 penalty was ordered.
  • Key point: Settlement terms may reduce a negligence finding and penalty when the record supports that the cited condition developed shortly before inspection.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

SECRETARY OF LABOR : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEVA 92-1011
Petitioner : A. C. No. 46-01452-03860
:
v. :
:
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, : Arkwright No. 1
Respondent :

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
ORDER TO MODIFY
ORDER TO PAY

Before: Judge Merlin

The above-captioned case was the subject of an extensive conference call between the undersigned and the counsel for both parties on February 1, 1993.

In accordance with the conference call discussion, the Solicitor, on February 12, 1993, filed a motion to approve settlement of the two violations involved in this case. The originally assessed penalties were $338 and the proposed settle- ments are for $265.

The Solicitor advises that the operator has agreed to pay the originally assessed penalty for Citation No. 3717918. I have reviewed this violation along with the Solicitor's motion and find that the proposed penalty is appropriate.

With respect to the other violation in this case, Citation No. 3717916, the Solicitor requests that the citation be modified by changing the evaluation of negligence from moderate to low and reducing the proposed penalty from $288 to $215. Citation No. 3717916 was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R. 75.503 because the conduit for the right side bolter emergency stop switch on the continuous mining machine was pulled out of its gland. As became apparent during the conference call, the reason for the reduction and modification was that the condition had not been present when the equipment was examined earlier in the shift but must have developed immediately prior to the issuance of the citation.

I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case along with the discussions on February 1, and I conclude that the proffered settlements are appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act.

In light of the foregoing, the motion for approval of settlements is GRANTED.

It is ORDERED that Citation No. 3717916 be MODIFIED to reduce negligence from moderate to low.

It is further ORDERED that the operator pay a penalty of $265 within 30 days of the date of this decision.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: (Certified Mail)

Charles M. Jackson, Esq,. Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Depart- ment of Labor, 4015 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22203

Daniel E. Rogers, Esq., Consol Inc., Consol Plaza, 1800 Washing- ton Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15241-1421

rdj

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace