FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket WEVA 92-1010-D Decided December 11, 1992 Settled Judge David F. Barbour Transcribed from scan

Island Creek Coal Company

Ralph J. Thorn v. Island Creek Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 92-1010-D): Discrimination settlement approved and case dismissed

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1992
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision approving a settlement, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary filed a discrimination complaint on behalf of miner Ralph J. Thorn, who alleged that Island Creek Coal Company placed an unlawful written warning in his personnel file. Island Creek agreed to remove the warnings and related references, not rely on the discipline in future actions, comply with the Mine Act's discrimination protections, pay a $1,000 civil penalty, and post the settlement materials at the Dobbin Mine. Judge David F. Barbour found the settlement to be in the public interest and ordered the parties to comply. The proceeding was to be dismissed after Island Creek mailed the original warnings to the Secretary and paid the penalty.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, Island Creek was ordered to complete the agreed remedies and pay $1,000, and the proceeding was to be dismissed upon compliance.
  • Key point: A Mine Act discrimination settlement may require correction of personnel records, future non-retaliation, a civil payment, and public posting of the agreement.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)


Page 2

~2044

      FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

             OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
                    2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
                     5203 LEESBURG PIKE
                FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : Docket No. WEVA 92-1010-D
on behalf of : MORG CD 92-03
Ralph J. Thorn, :
Complainant : Dobbin Mine
v. :
:
ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY, :
Respondent :

       ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE

Before: Judge Barbour

 This proceeding concerns a complaint of discrimination filed

by the Secretary of Labor ("Secretary") on behalf of Ralph J. Thorn,
Complainant, against Island Creek Coal Co. ("Island Creek")
pursuant to Section 105 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act
of 1977 (the "Mine Act"), 30 U.S.C. § 815(c). The complaint
alleges that the Complainant was illegally discriminated against
on February 5, 1992, when a written warning was unlawfully placed
in his personnel employment file. Island Creek filed a timely
answer denying that it had violated Complainant's Section 105(c)
rights and the parties engaged in pre-trial discovery. Following
the scheduling of this matter for hearing, counsels for the
parties settled the case, and counsel for the Secretary has
submitted a motion to approve the settlement. The motion is
signed by counsels and the Complainant and sets forth the parties
agreements with respect to resolving the matter. In particular,
it states:

 1.   That Island Creek agrees to clear Complainant's

employment record of all references pertaining to any incidents
occurring from February 4 through February 14, 1992, at
the Dobbin Mine; that Island Creek specifically agrees to
immediately expunge the disciplinary warnings which were dated
February 5, 1992 by Michael Nestor and February 14, 1992 by
Richard Perando, and any references to such warnings, from any
and all personnel files, payroll files, mine files, supervisors'
notes, microfilm/microfiche files, and any other records
maintained by Island Creek, Island Creek Corporation, or by any
of their agents; and that Island Creek further agrees to mail the
original copies of the warnings to the Secretary within ten (10)
days of the issuance of the Order approving settlement.


Page 3

~2045
2. That Island Creek agrees that it shall not assert, rely
upon, or otherwise consider the disciplinary actions taken in
February 1992 in any future disciplinary action, personnel
decision, or other action involving the Complainant.

 3.   That Island Creek asserts that it is complying and will

continue to comply with Section 105(c) of the Mine Act, agrees
that it will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate
against or otherwise interfere with the exercise of the statutory
rights of any miner, representative of miners, or applicant for
employment in any coal or other mine subject to the Mine Act
because such miner, representative of miners, or applicant for
employment had filed or made a complaint under or related to the
Mine Act, including a complaint notifying the Respondent, the
Respondent's agent, of an alleged danger, or safety or health
violation in a coal or other mine, or because such miner,
representative of miners, or applicant for employment is the
subject of medical evaluations and potential transfer under a
standard published pursuant to Section 101 of the Mine Act, or
because such miner, representative of miners, or applicant for
employment has instituted or caused to be instituted any
proceeding under or related to the Mine Act or has testified or
is about to testify in any such proceeding, or because of the
exercise by such miner, representative of miner, or applicant for
employment on behalf of himself or others of any statutory right
afforded by the Mine Act.

 4.   That Island Creek agrees to pay a civil penalty of one

thousand ($1,000) within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the
Order approving settlement.

 5.   That Island Creek agrees to post a copy of the Motion

To Approve Settlement and this Order approving settlement at the
Dobbin Mine for a period of not less than thirty (30) days.

 6.   That the parties agree the settlement agreement shall

not be offered or used for any other purpose whatsoever, except
for Mine Act proceedings.

 7.   That except for amounts already received by Complainant

and the reinstatement of personal leave to the Complainant, the
parties agree to bear their own costs.

 I conclude that the settlement, which compromises and

settles this matter amicably, is in the public interest and
should be approved.
ORDER

 Accordingly, Island Creek is ORDERED to comply with

provisions 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the Agreement as stated above,
and Island Creek, the Secretary and the Complainant are ORDERED


Page 4

~2046

to comply with provisions 6 and 7 of the Agreement, as stated
above. Island Creek shall mail to the Secretary the original
warnings dated February 5 and February 14, 1992 within ten (10)
days of the date of this Order and a civil penalty of ($1,000)
within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Upon receipt
of the warnings and of payment, this proceeding is DISMISSED.

  Counsels are commended and thanked for the diligent and

responsible manner in which they have represented their
respective clients during the course of this proceeding and in
which they have kept me advised of the ongoing status of this
case.
David F. Barbour
Administrative Law Judge
(703) 756-5232

Distribution:

Heather Bupp-Hubuda, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Rm 516,
Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)

Keith Fischler, Industrial Relations Counsel, Island Creek
Corporation, 250 W. Main Street, Lexington, KY 40575-1430
(Certified Mail)

Mr. Ralph J. Thorn, Berry Street, P.O. Box 294,
Tunnelton, WV 26444 (Certified Mail)

/epy

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1992, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.