Consolidation Coal Company (ALJ decision, July 17, 1991)
Consolidation Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 91-92 and WEVA 91-102): Settlement approved with reduced penalty
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1991 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Consolidation Coal asked the judge to approve a settlement in two civil penalty proceedings involving citations at the Loveridge No. 22 and Robinson Run No. 95 mines. The settlement removed the significant-and-substantial findings from two citations and reduced the proposed penalties from $1,722 to $1,400. Judge Gary Melick approved the agreement and ordered the company to pay $1,400 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: The order does not identify the underlying regulatory standards.
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, S&S findings were deleted, and the total penalty was reduced to $1,400.
- Key point: The judge approved the settlement after considering the parties’ representations and documentation under the Mine Act criteria.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Page 2
~1131
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges 2 Skyline, 10th Floor 5203 Leesburg Pike Falls Church, Virginia 22041
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEVA 91-92 PETITIONER A.C. No. 46-01433-03953 v. Loveridge No. 22 Mine CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY, RESPONDENT Docket No. WEVA 91-102 A.C. No. 46-01318-03975
Robinson Run No. 95 Mine
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Charles Jackson, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Virginia, for the Petitioner; Walter J. Scheller III, Esq., Consolidation Coal Company, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for the Respondent.
Before: Judge Melick
These cases are before me upon petitions for assessment of civil penalty under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Act). At hearings, petitioner filed a motion to approve a settlement agreement which was supplemented post-hearing. A modification of Citation Nos. 3308698 and 3309261 to delete the "significant and substantial" findings and a reduction in penalties from $1,722 to $1,400 has been proposed. I have considered the representations and documentation submitted in this case, and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in section 110(i) of the Act.
WHEREFORE, the motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that Respondent pay a penalty of $1,400 within 30 days of this order.
Gary Melick
Administration Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace