Valley Camp Coal Company, and Shrewbury Coal Company (ALJ decision, July 7, 1993)
Valley Camp Coal Company and Shrewbury Coal Company (FMSHRC WEVA 91-1949-C): Settlement dismissal approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The United Mine Workers brought a compensation proceeding on behalf of Gary Price, Billy L. Wilkinson Jr., and similarly situated miners against Valley Camp Coal Company and Shrewbury Coal Company. Judge Avram Weisberger lifted a prior stay after finding that the parties' settlement was a fair disposition of the issues. He granted the motion to dismiss based on representations that the settlement payments had been made and dismissed the case.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: The order does not identify specific Mine Act standards.
- Outcome: The stay was lifted, the settlement-based dismissal was granted, and the case was dismissed.
- Key point: The ALJ dismissed the compensation proceeding after finding the settlement fair and receiving representations that the required payments had been made.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
UNITED MINE WORKERS V. VALLEY CAMP COAL
DDATE:
19930707
TTEXT:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, : COMPENSATION PROCEEDING
ON BEHALF OF GARY PRICE, :
BILLY L. WILKINSON, JR. : Docket No. WEVA 91-1949-C
AND ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED :
MINERS, : V C No. 8 Preparation Plant
Petitioners :
:
v. :
:
VALLEY CAMP COAL COMPANY, :
AND SHREWBURY COAL COMPANY :
Respondents :
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Weisberger
It is ORDERED that the Stay Order of June 23, 1992 is hereby lifted.
The parties previously filed a settlement agreement which I find is a fair disposition of the issues presented in this case.
Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss is granted based on
representations that payments have been made in accordance with
the settlement agreement.
It is ORDERED that these cases be DISMISSED.
Avram Weisberger
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
David Hardy, Esq., Jackson & Kelly, 1800 Laidley Tower, P.O. Box
553, Charleston, WV 25322 (Certified Mail)
Pamela Silverman, Esq., Carl C. Charneski, Esq., Office of the
Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Room
516, Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)
Mary Lu Jordan, Esq., UMWA, 900 15th Street, NW, Washington,DC
20005 (Certified Mail)
nb
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace